Jaguar XJ (X350)
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32VvsVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S80 · Facelift 2003
2.9 T6 24V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque411 Nm303 lb-ft
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight186 hp/t139 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.0 L/100 km14.7 mpg US17.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.1 L/100 km29.0 mpg US34.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range780 km485 mi
- Largest trunk470 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score62/100
- Best economy score78/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 411Nm303lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 2,120kg4,674lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 72.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.7s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.9L/100 km21.6mpg US25.9mpg UK | 11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK | 16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.1L/100 km29mpg US34.9mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 186hp/t139kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 168hp/t126kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 780km485mi Calculated | 708km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 2,922cc178cu in |
| Length | 5,090mm200in | 4,822mm190in |
| Width | 1,860mm73in | 1,832mm72in |
| Height | 1,448mm57in | 1,452mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,034mm119in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,556mm61in | 1,570mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,548mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 470L | 460L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,126L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 85L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 272g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 5,200 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.7 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 164 km/h 102 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 272 hp 203 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V has 28 hp more than Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V and Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V: 28 hp (21 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 6.6 s |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V and Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 780 km 485 mi |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 708 km 440 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.6 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 272 hp 203 kW | 7.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V |
| 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V |
| 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V | VolvoS80Facelift 20032.9 T6 24V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 411 Nm 303 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.9 L/100 km 21.6 mpg US 25.9 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km 20.8 mpg US 25.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 780 km 485 mi | 708 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 272 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | 460 L 16.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 186 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 168 hp/t 126 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V | Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.9 L/100 km21.6 mpg US25.9 mpg UK | 11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.08 LC100 km | 19.78 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 30.70 LC100 mi | 31.82 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,635 L432 US gal360 UK gal | 1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,861 LC/year | 2,966 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X350) 4.2 V8 32V
- Has 28 hp more
- Has 31 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range
- Has 10 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Volvo S80 Facelift 2003 2.9 T6 24V
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























