Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) · Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8vsJaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X308)
R 4.0 V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque510 Nm376 lb-ft
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.1 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption8.5 L/100 km27.7 mpg US33.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score70/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V
- Most powerful363 hp271 kW
- Best estimated range643 km399 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 347hp259kW | 363hp271kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 505Nm372lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,845kg4,068lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,260kg4,982lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 56.7s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.3s Calculated | 17.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.1L/100 km13.8mpg US16.5mpg UK | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.4s Calculated | 13.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 325Nm/t217lb-ft/ton Calculated | 274Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 530km329mi Calculated | 643km399mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 3,996cc244cu in |
| Length | 4,516mm178in | 5,023mm198in |
| Width | 1,723mm68in | 1,799mm71in |
| Height | 1,387mm55in | 1,345mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,690mm106in | 2,870mm113in |
| Front track | 1,509mm59in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,483mm58in | 1,498mm59in |
| Trunk volume | - | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 81L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 6,150 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,400 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.3 s | 17.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.4 s | 13.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 179 km/h 111 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 363 hp 271 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V has 16 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 505 Nm 372 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 5.5 s |
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 5.6 s |
Although Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 530 km 329 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 643 km 399 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 347 hp 259 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 363 hp 271 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 |
| 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V |
| 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W202)Facelift 1997AMG C 55 V8 | JaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 347 hp 259 kW | 363 hp 271 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 505 Nm 372 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,845 kg 4,068 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.7 L/100 km 20.1 mpg US 24.1 mpg UK | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 530 km 329 mi | 643 km 399 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8 | Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK | 12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.47 LC100 km | 22.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.95 LC100 mi | 35.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,755 L464 US gal386 UK gal | 1,890 L499 US gal416 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,071 LC/year | 3,308 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W202) Facelift 1997 AMG C 55 V8
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 275 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Jaguar XJ (X308) R 4.0 V8 32V
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 113 km (70 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























