Mercedes-Benz E-class (W124)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W124) E 500 V8vsJaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X300)
R 4.0 24V Sport
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W124) E 500 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t140 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Best estimated range692 km430 mi
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score67/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport
- Highest torque512 Nm378 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Best economy score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 320hp239kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 470Nm347lb-ft | 512Nm378lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | 2,160kg4,762lb | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 65.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.1s Calculated | 19.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 13L/100 km18.1mpg US21.7mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.0s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 187hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 275Nm/t184lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 692km430mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,973cc303cu in | 3,980cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,750mm187in | 5,023mm198in |
| Width | 1,796mm71in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,408mm55in | 1,303mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,800mm110in | 2,870mm113in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,529mm60in | 1,498mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 86L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W124) E 500 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | 5,600 rpm | 3,900 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 5,000 rpm | 3,050 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.1 s | 19.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.0 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 320 hp 239 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 512 Nm 378 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | 6.1 s |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W124) E 500 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W124) E 500 V8: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | 187 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | 692 km 430 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 |
| 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W124) E 500 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | 187 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W124)E 500 V8 | JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 320 hp 239 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 470 Nm 347 lb-ft | 512 Nm 378 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 13.0 L/100 km 18.1 mpg US 21.7 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 692 km 430 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 187 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W124) E 500 V8 | Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 13 L/100 km18.1 mpg US21.7 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.75 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 36.61 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,950 L515 US gal429 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,413 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W124) E 500 V8
- Is 165 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 4 km (3 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport
- Has 42 Nm more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























