Maserati Quattroporte IV
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V BiturbovsJaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X300)
R 4.0 24V Sport
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed275 km/h171 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,515 kg3,340 lb
- Best power-to-weight202 hp/t151 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk495 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport
- Most powerful320 hp239 kW
- Highest torque512 Nm378 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range688 km428 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 320hp239kW |
| Torque | 373Nm275lb-ft | 512Nm378lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,515kg3,340lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,295kg5,060lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.9s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated | 65.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.8s Calculated | 19.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 202hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 630km391mi Calculated | 688km428mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 3,980cc243cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 5,023mm198in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,303mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,870mm113in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,502mm59in | 1,498mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 495L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 86L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 6,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 5,000 rpm | 3,050 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.8 s | 19.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 306 hp 228 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 320 hp 239 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport has 14 hp more than Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo and Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 512 Nm 378 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 5.9 s |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 6.3 s |
Although Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport has more power, Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo and Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 630 km 391 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 688 km 428 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 320 hp 239 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | JaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 320 hp 239 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | 512 Nm 378 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 630 km 391 mi | 688 km 428 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 495 L 17.5 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.22 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,334 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo
- Is 360 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Jaguar XJ (X300) R 4.0 24V Sport
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 139 Nm more
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 58 km (36 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























