Maserati Quattroporte IV
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V BiturbovsJaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X300)
6.0 V12 Lang
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.9 s
- Fastest top speed275 km/h171 mph Unrestricted260 km/h162 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,515 kg3,340 lb
- Best power-to-weight202 hp/t151 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range630 km391 mi
- Largest trunk495 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang
- Most powerful311 hp232 kW
- Highest torque475 Nm350 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 306hp228kW | 311hp232kW |
| Torque | 373Nm275lb-ft | 475Nm350lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,515kg3,340lb | 1,975kg4,354lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,395kg5,280lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Calculated | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.9s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated | 73.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.8s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 202hp/t151kW/t92hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 630km391mi Calculated | 548km340mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,996cc122cu in | 5,993cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,550mm179in | 5,149mm203in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,380mm54in | 1,314mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,995mm118in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,502mm59in | 1,498mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 495L | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 86L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 6,250 rpm | 4,250 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 5,350 rpm | 2,850 rpm | 5,600 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.8 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph Likely limited | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 306 hp 228 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 311 hp 232 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang has 5 hp more than Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo and Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 5.9 s |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 7.2 s |
Although Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang has more power, Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo and Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo and Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang: 3.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 630 km 391 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 548 km 340 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 311 hp 232 kW | 7.2 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo |
| 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang |
| 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte IV2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Lang | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 306 hp 228 kW | 311 hp 232 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 373 Nm 275 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 275 km/h171 mph Restricted 260 km/h162 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.7 L/100 km 18.5 mpg US 22.2 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 630 km 391 mi | 548 km 340 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 495 L 17.5 cu ft | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 202 hp/t 151 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo | Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.22 LC100 km | 27.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.77 LC100 mi | 44.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal | 2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,334 LC/year | 4,121 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte IV 2.0 i V6 24V Biturbo
- Is 460 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 82 km (51 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Lang
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 102 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























