Jaguar XJ (X300)
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 ClassicvsNissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Cedric (Y33)
3.0T V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Lightest1,570 kg3,461 lb
- Best power-to-weight172 hp/t128 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range620 km385 mi
- Best economy score72/100
- Best practicality score79/100
Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic
- Fastest top speed254 km/h158 mph
- Most powerful311 hp232 kW
- Highest torque475 Nm350 lb-ft
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score60/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 311hp232kW | 270hp201kW |
| Torque | 475Nm350lb-ft | 368Nm271lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,975kg4,354lb | 1,570kg3,461lb |
| Gross weight | 2,395kg5,280lb | - |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated | 66.9s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.2s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.4s Calculated | 25.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 172hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 234Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 548km340mi Calculated | 620km385mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,993cc366cu in | 2,987cc182cu in |
| Length | 5,023mm198in | - |
| Width | 1,798mm71in | - |
| Height | 1,314mm52in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,870mm113in | - |
| Front track | 1,500mm59in | - |
| Rear track | 1,498mm59in | - |
| Ground clearance | - | 145mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 430L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 86L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic: Power / Torque
- Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 5,350 rpm | 2,850 rpm | 5,600 rpm |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 6,000 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.2 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.4 s | 25.8 s |
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 101 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 311 hp 232 kW |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 270 hp 201 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic has 41 hp more than Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 and Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic: 41 hp (31 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 7.2 s |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 7.0 s |
Although Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic has more power, Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 and Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 and Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 548 km 340 mi |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 620 km 385 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 311 hp 232 kW | 7.2 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 270 hp 201 kW | 7.0 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic |
| 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 |
| 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
| NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | NissanCedric (Y33)3.0T V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 311 hp 232 kW | 270 hp 201 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | 368 Nm 271 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.2 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 254 km/h 158 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km 18.2 mpg US 21.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 548 km 340 mi | 620 km 385 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 172 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic | Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK | 12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 27.47 LC100 km | 22.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 44.22 LC100 mi | 36.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal | 1,935 L511 US gal426 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,121 LC/year | 3,386 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic
- Has 41 hp more
- Has 107 Nm more
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Nissan Cedric (Y33) 3.0T V6
- Is 405 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 72 km (45 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























