Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 5.0 V8vsJaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X300)
6.0 V12 Classic
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful510 hp380 kW
- Highest torque625 Nm461 lb-ft
- Lightest1,875 kg4,134 lb
- Best power-to-weight272 hp/t203 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range721 km448 mi
- Best overall score80/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score77/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 510hp380kW | 311hp232kW |
| Torque | 625Nm461lb-ft | 475Nm350lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,975kg4,354lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,395kg5,280lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 46.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 73.2s99% target: 251 km/h / 156 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.4s Calculated | 23.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.8s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 272hp/t203kW/t123hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 333Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 721km448mi Calculated | 548km340mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 5,993cc366cu in |
| Length | 5,130mm202in | 5,023mm198in |
| Width | 1,899mm75in | 1,798mm71in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,314mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 3,032mm119in | 2,870mm113in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in | 1,500mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,498mm59in |
| Trunk volume | - | 430L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 80L | 86L |
| CO2 emissions | 264g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 5,350 rpm | 2,850 rpm | 5,600 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.4 s | 23.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 254 km/h 158 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.8 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.8 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 189 km/h 117 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 311 hp 232 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 has 199 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8: 199 hp (148 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 254 km/h 158 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 4.9 s |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic: 2.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 and Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic: 4.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 721 km 448 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 548 km 340 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 510 hp 380 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 311 hp 232 kW | 7.2 s | 254 km/h 158 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 |
| 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic |
| 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20155.0 V8 | JaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 510 hp 380 kW | 311 hp 232 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 625 Nm 461 lb-ft | 475 Nm 350 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 254 km/h 158 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 1,975 kg 4,354 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.1 L/100 km 21.2 mpg US 25.4 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 721 km 448 mi | 548 km 340 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 264 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 430 L 15.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 272 hp/t 203 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8 | Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 19.43 LC100 km | 27.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 31.26 LC100 mi | 44.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal | 2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,914 LC/year | 4,121 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 5.0 V8
- Has 199 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 2.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 4.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 115 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 173 km (107 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Jaguar XJ (X300) 6.0 V12 Classic
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























