Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6vsJaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
S 3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque520 Nm384 lb-ft
- Lightest1,615 kg3,560 lb
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions183 g/km
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
- Most powerful380 hp283 kW
- Best estimated range860 km535 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 380hp283kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,615kg3,560lb | 1,760kg3,880lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,370kg5,225lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 44.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 51.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.8s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 322Nm/t215lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 825km513mi Calculated | 860km535mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,756mm187in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,839mm72in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,426mm56in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,840mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,609mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,546mm61in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 505L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 183g/km | 204g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.8 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 119 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6 and Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | 4.7 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 5.3 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6 and Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6 and Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | 825 km 513 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 860 km 535 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | 367 hp 274 kW | 4.7 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)AMG C 43 V6 | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 380 hp 283 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,615 kg 3,560 lb | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 825 km 513 mi | 860 km 535 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 183 g/km | 204 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6 | Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.00 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,100 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) AMG C 43 V6
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 21 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 35 km (22 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























