Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6vsLexus LS IV · Facelift 2012 600h V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLexus LS IV · Facelift 2012
600h V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,760 kg3,880 lb
- Best power-to-weight216 hp/t161 kW/t4.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8
- Most powerful394 hp294 kW
- Highest torque520 Nm384 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range977 km607 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 380hp283kW | 394hp294kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 520Nm384lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,760kg3,880lb | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Gross weight | 2,370kg5,225lb | 2,765kg6,096lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 66.5s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s Calculated | 19.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 14.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 216hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 860km535mi Calculated | 977km607mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 4,969cc303cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 5,090mm200in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,875mm74in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,470mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,970mm117in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,610mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,610mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 420L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 84L |
| CO2 emissions | 204g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 6,400 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 19.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 14.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 394 hp 294 kW |
Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8 has 14 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 and Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 2,390 kg 5,269 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 5.3 s |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 6.1 s |
Although Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8 has more power, Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 and Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 860 km 535 mi |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 977 km 607 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 394 hp 294 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | LexusLS IVFacelift 2012600h V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 380 hp 283 kW | 394 hp 294 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,760 kg 3,880 lb | 2,390 kg 5,269 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 860 km 535 mi | 977 km 607 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 204 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 420 L 14.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 216 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 | Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 15.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 2,258 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
- Is 630 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 51 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 85 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Lexus LS IV Facelift 2012 600h V8
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 116 km (72 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























