Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 43vsJaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
S 3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 43
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful401 hp299 kW
- Highest torque520 Nm384 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight227 hp/t169 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions192 g/km
- Best overall score76/100
- Best performance score75/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range892 km554 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 401hp299kW | 380hp283kW |
| Torque | 520Nm384lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,415kg5,324lb | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 46.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 51.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.9s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.5s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated | 222hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 295Nm/t197lb-ft/ton Calculated | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 786km488mi Calculated | 892km554mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 505L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 192g/km | 198g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 43: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | 6,100 rpm | 2,500-5,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.9 s | 15.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.6 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.5 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 191 km/h 118 mph | 184 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | 401 hp 299 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW |
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 43 has 21 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 43: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | 4.6 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 5.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 43 and Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | 786 km 488 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 892 km 554 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | 401 hp 299 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 43 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 43 | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 401 hp 299 kW | 380 hp 283 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 520 Nm 384 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 786 km 488 mi | 892 km 554 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 192 g/km | 198 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 43 | Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 14.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,179 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) AMG E 43
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 106 km (66 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























