Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6vsJaguar XJ (X358) R 4.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X358)
R 4.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.7 L/100 km20.1 mpg US24.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range892 km554 mi
- Largest trunk505 L
- Best economy score85/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Jaguar XJ (X358) R 4.2 V8
- Most powerful395 hp295 kW
- Highest torque541 Nm399 lb-ft
- Lightest1,653 kg3,644 lb
- Best power-to-weight239 hp/t178 kW/t4.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 380hp283kW | 395hp295kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 541Nm399lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,653kg3,644lb |
| Gross weight | 2,330kg5,137lb | 2,263kg4,989lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 51.2s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 52.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.3s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.7s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 12.1L/100 km19.4mpg US23.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | 17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 222hp/t166kW/t101hp/1000 lb Calculated | 239hp/t178kW/t108hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 327Nm/t219lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 892km554mi Calculated | 702km437mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 4,196cc256cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 5,091mm200in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,462mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 3,034mm119in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,556mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,546mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | 470L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 85L |
| CO2 emissions | 198g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X358) R 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 | 6,100 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.3 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.7 s | 15.8 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.0 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 | 395 hp 295 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X358) R 4.2 V8 has 15 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X358) R 4.2 V8: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 | 541 Nm 399 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 | 1,653 kg 3,644 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 5.3 s |
| JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 | 5.3 s |
Although Jaguar XJ (X358) R 4.2 V8 has more power, Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X358) R 4.2 V8: 3.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 | 239 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 892 km 554 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 | 702 km 437 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 380 hp 283 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 | 395 hp 295 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 |
| 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
| JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | 5.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 | 239 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6 | JaguarXJ (X358)R 4.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 380 hp 283 kW | 395 hp 295 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 541 Nm 399 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.3 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,653 kg 3,644 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km 19.4 mpg US 23.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 892 km 554 mi | 702 km 437 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 198 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | 470 L 16.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 222 hp/t 166 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 239 hp/t 178 kW/t 4.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6 | Jaguar XJ (X358) R 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 12.1 L/100 km19.4 mpg US23.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 21.18 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 34.08 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,815 L479 US gal399 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 3,176 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) S 3.0 V6
- Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 189 km (117 mi) more estimated range
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar XJ (X358) R 4.2 V8
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 91 Nm more
- Is 57 kg lighter
- Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























