Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
3.0 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful340 hp254 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight199 hp/t148 kW/t5.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34.0 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions198 g/km
- Best estimated range892 km554 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score69/100
- Best economy score85/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 340hp254kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Gross weight | 2,330kg5,137lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 62.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.2s Calculated | 18.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.3L/100 km28.3mpg US34.0mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.7L/100 km20.1mpg US24.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb Calculated | 193hp/t144kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 263Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 892km554mi Calculated | 879km546mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,995cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 505L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 198g/km | 211g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 6,500 rpm | 3,500-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.2 s | 18.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 5.4 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 5.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 892 km 554 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 879 km 546 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 340 hp 254 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 |
| 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)3.0 V6 | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 340 hp 254 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | 1,765 kg 3,891 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.3 L/100 km 28.3 mpg US 34.0 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 892 km 554 mi | 879 km 546 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 198 g/km | 211 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 199 hp/t 148 kW/t 5.0 kg/hp | 193 hp/t 144 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6 | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.3 L/100 km28.3 mpg US34 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.53 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.38 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,245 L329 US gal274 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,179 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 3.0 V6
- Is 55 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 12 km (8 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 13 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























