Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 25tvsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 25t
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed244 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,629 kg3,591 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions166 g/km
- Best estimated range1,014 km630 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)25t | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,629kg3,591lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Gross weight | 2,260kg4,982lb | - |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.7s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.8s Calculated | 28.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,014km630mi Calculated | 952km592mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 166g/km | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 25t: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)25t | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.8 s | 28.6 s |
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 164 km/h 102 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 250 hp 186 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) 25t has 10 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X260) 25t: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 1,629 kg 3,591 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 6.7 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25t and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 1.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25t and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 1,014 km 630 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 952 km 592 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.7 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 25t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)25t | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)25t | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 244 km/h 152 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,629 kg 3,591 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,014 km 630 mi | 952 km 592 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 166 g/km | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 25t | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 25t
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 106 kg lighter
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 61 km (38 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 33 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























