Car comparison

Kia Optima IV · Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDIvsJaguar XF (X260) 25d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Kia Optima IV · Facelift 2018

2.0 T-GDI

238 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2020
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

25d

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 25d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.9 s
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,158 km
    719 mi
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelKiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDIJaguarXF (X260)25d
Power
238hp177kW
240hp179kW
Torque
353Nm260lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,680kg3,704lb
1,733kg3,821lb
Gross weight
2,120kg4,674lb
2,370kg5,225lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Calculated
246 km/h
153 mph
To 99% top speed
72.9s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph
Calculated
68.3s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
6.9s
0-200 km/h
24.4s
Calculated
23.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
6.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.2s
Calculated
14.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton
Calculated
289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
753km468mi
Calculated
1,158km719mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,855mm191in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,860mm73in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,475mm58in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,805mm110in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,607mm63in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,614mm64in
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance-
116mm5in
Trunk volume
510L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
66L
CO2 emissions-
155g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Kia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDIJaguar XF (X260) 25dPowerTorque
  • Kia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 25d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI6,000 rpm1,350-4,000 rpm6,250 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)25d4,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricKiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDIJaguarXF (X260)25d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
6.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
6.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
24.4 s
23.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Likely limited
246 km/h
153 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.2 s
14.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
99 mph
162 km/h
101 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
238 hp
177 kW
JaguarXF (X260)25d
240 hp
179 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 25d has 2 hp more than Kia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI.

The biggest power difference is between Kia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI and Jaguar XF (X260) 25d: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)25d
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
JaguarXF (X260)25d
1,733 kg
3,821 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
JaguarXF (X260)25d
246 km/h
153 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI7.4 s
JaguarXF (X260)25d6.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25d and Kia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)25d
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 25d and Kia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI: 3.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)25d
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
753 km
468 mi
JaguarXF (X260)25d
1,158 km
719 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
238 hp
177 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
JaguarXF (X260)25d
240 hp
179 kW
6.9 s
246 km/h
153 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
JaguarXF (X260)25d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)25d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.9 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 25d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
7.4 s
JaguarXF (X260)25d
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
6.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)25d
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleKiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDIJaguarXF (X260)25d
Power
238 hp
177 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
353 Nm
260 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
6.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
250 km/h155 mph
Restricted
240 km/h149 mph
246 km/h
153 mph
Lightness
1,680 kg
3,704 lb
1,733 kg
3,821 lb
Fuel consumption
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
510 L
18.0 cu ft
Length
4,855 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
753 km
468 mi
1,158 km
719 mi
CO2 score
-
155 g/km
Trunk score
510 L
18.0 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleKia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDIJaguar XF (X260) 25d
Consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.28 LC100 km9.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.19 LC100 mi16.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal855 L226 US gal188 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,441 LC/year1,496 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Kia Optima IV Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI

  • Is 53 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Jaguar XF (X260) 25d

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 147 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 3.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 405 km (252 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Kia Optima IV 2.0 T-GDI
Jaguar XF (X260) 25d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T-GDI
2.0 D5
VS
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDIvsVolvoS902.0 D5
25d
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)25dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 T-GDI
1.8 TCe
VS
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDIvsRenaultTalisman1.8 TCe
25d
25d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)25dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)25d
2.0 T-GDI
Redline 550T
VS
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDIvsChevroletMalibu (XL)Facelift 2019Redline 550T
25d
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)25dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 T-GDI
2.0 TDI
VS
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDIvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
25d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)25dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0 T-GDI
E 300d
VS
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDIvsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300d
25d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)25dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0 T-GDI
45 TFSI
VS
KiaOptima IVFacelift 20182.0 T-GDIvsAUDIA6 Sedan (C8)45 TFSI
25d
P250
VS
JaguarXF (X260)25dvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250
Kia Optima IV · Facelift 2018 2.0 T-GDI vs Jaguar XF (X260) 25d - car comparison - FastVsFaster