Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLynk & Co 03 · Facelift 2022
2.0TD T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Best estimated range831 km517 mi
- Largest trunk459 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5
- Most powerful254 hp189 kW
- Lightest1,560 kg3,439 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 254hp189kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,560kg3,439lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 69.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 52.6s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.4s Calculated | 30.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 831km517mi Calculated | 735km457mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,962mm195in | 4,684mm184in |
| Width | - | 1,843mm73in |
| Height | 1,456mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,730mm107in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,597mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,597mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 147mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 459L | 414L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,484L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.4 s | 30.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW |
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5 has 4 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 6.9 s |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 6.9 s |
Although Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5 has more power, Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 831 km 517 mi |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 735 km 457 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 254 hp 189 kW | 6.9 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Lynk & Co03Facelift 20222.0TD T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 254 hp 189 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,560 kg 3,439 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 831 km 517 mi | 735 km 457 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | 414 L 14.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i | Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 15 Nm more
- Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
- Has 96 km (60 mi) more estimated range
- Has 45 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Lynk & Co 03 Facelift 2022 2.0TD T5
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























