Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight151 hp/t112 kW/t6.6 kg/hp
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score59/100
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range952 km592 mi
- Best economy score84/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 340Nm251lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,735kg3,825lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.7s Calculated | 28.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 831km517mi Calculated | 952km592mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,962mm195in | 5,130mm202in |
| Width | 1,982mm78in | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,456mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 3,032mm119in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,626mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 459L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,484L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 199g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.7 s | 28.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 165 km/h 103 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i has 10 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 6.9 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 831 km 517 mi |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 952 km 592 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.9 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 340 Nm 251 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 831 km 517 mi | 952 km 592 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 199 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 459 L 16.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.58 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,336 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 75 kg lighter
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 121 km (75 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























