Car comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4vsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013

2.0 D4

181 hp1969 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedSedan2013-2015
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0d

180 hp1999 ccDieselRWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    240 km/h
    149 mph Unrestricted
    230 km/h
    143 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    181 hp
    135 kW
  • Lightest
    1,577 kg
    3,477 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    115 hp/t
    86 kW/t
    8.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    3.7 L/100 km
    63.6 mpg US
    76.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.4 L/100 km
    69.2 mpg US
    83.1 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,824 km
    1,134 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    97/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
181hp135kW
180hp134kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,577kg3,477lb
1,585kg3,494lb
Gross weight
2,060kg4,542lb
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
72.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
74.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
26.6s
Calculated
31.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
3.7L/100 km63.6mpg US76.3mpg UK
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.4L/100 km69.2mpg US83.1mpg UK
3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
271Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,824km1,134mi
Calculated
1,535km954mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,635mm182in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,865mm73in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,484mm58in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,776mm109in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,585mm62in
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance
136mm5in
116mm5in
Trunk volume
380L
505L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
68L
66L
CO2 emissions-
114g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D44,250 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm5,000 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.6 s
31.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.9 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
98 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
181 hp
135 kW
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 has 1 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,577 kg
3,477 lb
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,585 kg
3,494 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D47.4 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d8.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
3.7 L/100 km
63.6 mpg US
76.3 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
1,824 km
1,134 mi
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,535 km
954 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
181 hp
135 kW
7.4 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
8.0 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
3.7 L/100 km
63.6 mpg US
76.3 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
3.7 L/100 km
63.6 mpg US
76.3 mpg UK
7.4 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
3.7 L/100 km
63.6 mpg US
76.3 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
181 hp
135 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
8.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,577 kg
3,477 lb
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
Fuel consumption
3.7 L/100 km
63.6 mpg US
76.3 mpg UK
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
380 L
13.4 cu ft
Length
4,635 mm
182.5 in
Height
1,484 mm
58.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
1,824 km
1,134 mi
1,535 km
954 mi
CO2 score
-
114 g/km
Trunk score
380 L
13.4 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
115 hp/t
86 kW/t
8.7 kg/hp
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Consumption3.7 L/100 km63.6 mpg US76.3 mpg UK4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km6.48 LC100 km7.52 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi10.42 LC100 mi12.11 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used555 L147 US gal122 UK gal645 L170 US gal142 UK gal
Annual fuel cost971.25 LC/year1,129 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 D4

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 8 kg lighter
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 289 km (180 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 30 Nm more
  • Has 125 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo S60 II 2.0 D4
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 D4
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS60 II2.4 D5
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0 D4
2.4i T5 20V
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS602.4i T5 20V
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.0 D4
2.0 D4
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS902.0 D4
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0 D4
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsVolvoS40 IIFacelift 20072.5 T5
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0 D4
E 200
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013E 200
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0 D4
1.8 TFSI
VS
VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 D4vsAUDIA3 Sedan (8V)1.8 TFSI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
Volvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 D4 vs Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster