Car comparison

Volkswagen Passat (B8) 1.8 TSIvsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Passat (B8)

1.8 TSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0d

180 hp1999 ccDieselRWDManualTurbochargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.3 L/100 km
    54.7 mpg US
    65.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.1 L/100 km
    46.1 mpg US
    55.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.9 L/100 km
    60.3 mpg US
    72.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    114 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,535 km
    954 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100

Volkswagen Passat (B8) 1.8 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    232 km/h
    144 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Lightest
    1,405 kg
    3,097 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    128 hp/t
    96 kW/t
    7.8 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    586 L
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSIJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180hp134kW
180hp134kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,405kg3,097lb
1,585kg3,494lb
Gross weight
2,030kg4,475lb
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
To 99% top speed
70.9s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
74.0s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.0s
0-200 km/h
29.4s
Calculated
31.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
7.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb
Calculated
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton
Calculated
271Nm/t182lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,138km707mi
Calculated
1,535km954mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,798cc110cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,767mm188in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,832mm72in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,456mm57in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,791mm110in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,568mm62in
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance
145mm6in
116mm5in
Trunk volume
586L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,152L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
66L
CO2 emissions
130g/km
114g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Passat (B8) 1.8 TSIJaguar XF (X260) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Passat (B8) 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI5,100-6,200 rpm1,250-5,000 rpm6,450 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSIJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
7.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.4 s
31.0 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
152 km/h
94 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,585 kg
3,494 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI
232 km/h
144 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
230 km/h
143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI7.9 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d8.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Passat (B8) 1.8 TSI and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Volkswagen Passat (B8) 1.8 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI
1,138 km
707 mi
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,535 km
954 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
7.9 s
232 km/h
144 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
8.0 s
230 km/h
143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
586 L
20.7 cu ft
Length
4,767 mm
187.7 in
Height
1,456 mm
57.3 in
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.0 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
7.9 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
8.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSI
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSIJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.0 s
Top speed
232 km/h
144 mph
230 km/h
143 mph
Lightness
1,405 kg
3,097 lb
1,585 kg
3,494 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
4.3 L/100 km
54.7 mpg US
65.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
586 L
20.7 cu ft
Length
4,767 mm
187.7 in
Height
1,456 mm
57.3 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
1,138 km
707 mi
1,535 km
954 mi
CO2 score
130 g/km
114 g/km
Trunk score
586 L
20.7 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
128 hp/t
96 kW/t
7.8 kg/hp
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Passat (B8) 1.8 TSIJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km7.52 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi12.11 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal645 L170 US gal142 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,129 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Passat (B8) 1.8 TSI

  • Is 180 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 81 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 180 Nm more
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 397 km (247 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 16 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Passat (B8) 1.8 TSI
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)1.8 TSI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1.8 TSI
2.8 V6 30V
VS
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat (B5)2.8 V6 30V
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
1.8 TSI
2.8 30V V6
VS
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat (B5.5)2.8 30V V6
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenPassat (B8)1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)Facelift 20192.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
Volkswagen Passat (B8) 1.8 TSI vs Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster