Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 20dvsMercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
E 200d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 20d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight108 hp/t81 kW/t9.2 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,269 km789 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d
- Lightest1,631 kg3,596 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)20d | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 160hp119kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,659kg3,657lb | 1,631kg3,596lb |
| Gross weight | 2,295kg5,060lb | 2,341kg5,161lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.2s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 77.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.1s Calculated | 34.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 108hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated | 98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,269km789mi Calculated | 1,042km647mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,923mm194in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,852mm73in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,468mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,939mm116in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,619mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 116mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | - | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X260) 20d: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 3,200 rpm | 1,600-2,600 rpm | 3,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)20d | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.1 s | 34.3 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 149 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 180 hp 134 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 160 hp 119 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) 20d has 20 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d and Jaguar XF (X260) 20d: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 1,631 kg 3,596 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 8.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 8.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 1,269 km 789 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 1,042 km 647 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.4 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)20d | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 160 hp 119 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,659 kg 3,657 lb | 1,631 kg 3,596 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,269 km 789 mi | 1,042 km 647 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 108 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 20d | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.10 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,365 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 20d
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 228 km (141 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d
- Is 28 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























