Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dvsToyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014 2.5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0d

180 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Toyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014

2.5

181 hp2494 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedSedan2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    129 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,347 km
    837 mi
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100
  • Best practicality score
    76/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)2.0dToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
Power
180hp134kW
181hp135kW
Torque
430Nm317lb-ft
231Nm170lb-ft
Curb weight
1,700kg3,748lb
1,465kg3,230lb
Gross weight
2,310kg5,093lb
2,100kg4,630lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
75.2s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
76.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
9.0s
0-200 km/h
35.9s
Calculated
38.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton
Calculated
158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,347km837mi
Calculated
897km558mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
2,494cc152cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
4,850mm191in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,825mm72in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,480mm58in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,775mm109in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,575mm62in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,565mm62in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
-
Trunk volume
505L
506L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
70L
CO2 emissions
129g/km
183g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dToyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.56,000 rpm4,100 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)2.0dToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
9.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.9 s
38.3 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
3.0 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
11.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
14.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
148 km/h
92 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
181 hp
135 kW

Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5 has 1 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: 1 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
231 Nm
170 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,700 kg
3,748 lb
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
1,465 kg
3,230 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
222 km/h
138 mph
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d8.4 s
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.59.0 s

Although Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5 has more power, Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: 0.6 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: 2.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,347 km
837 mi
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
897 km
558 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
8.4 s
222 km/h
138 mph
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
181 hp
135 kW
9.0 s
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
506 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
Power
181 hp
135 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.4 s
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
9.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)2.0dToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5
Power
180 hp
134 kW
181 hp
135 kW
Torque
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
231 Nm
170 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
9.0 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Unrestricted
220 km/h137 mph
Restricted
210 km/h130 mph
Lightness
1,700 kg
3,748 lb
1,465 kg
3,230 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
7.8 L/100 km
30.2 mpg US
36.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
506 L
17.9 cu ft
Length
4,850 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,480 mm
58.3 in
Range score
1,347 km
837 mi
897 km
558 mi
CO2 score
129 g/km
183 g/km
Trunk score
505 L
17.8 cu ft
506 L
17.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
124 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 2.0dToyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km13.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi21.97 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year2,048 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 199 Nm more
  • Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 450 km (279 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 54 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5

  • Has 1 hp more
  • Is 235 kg lighter
  • Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 1 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) 2.5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.5
3.5 V6
VS
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5vsToyotaCamry VII (XV50)3.5 V6
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.5
3.5i V6
VS
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5vsToyotaCamry VI (XV40)3.5i V6
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.5
2.2 D-CAT
VS
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5vsToyotaAvensis IIIFacelift 20122.2 D-CAT
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.5
2.2 D-CAT
VS
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5vsToyotaAvensis III2.2 D-CAT
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.5
1.5 EcoBoost
VS
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5vsFordFocus III SedanFacelift 20141.5 EcoBoost
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
2.5
1.6 THP
VS
ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5vsPeugeot408 II1.6 THP
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d vs Toyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014 2.5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster