Car comparison

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0vsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

2.0

240 hp1999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0d

180 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    138 hp/t
    103 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,700 kg
    3,748 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    129 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,347 km
    837 mi
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
240hp179kW
180hp134kW
Torque
340Nm251lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,735kg3,825lb
1,700kg3,748lb
Gross weight-
2,310kg5,093lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
75.2s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.9s
8.4s
0-200 km/h
28.6s
Calculated
35.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.5s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.7s
Calculated
16.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
253Nm/t169lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
952km592mi
Calculated
1,347km837mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
5,130mm202in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,899mm75in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,460mm57in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
3,032mm119in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,626mm64in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance-
116mm5in
Trunk volume-
505L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
80L
66L
CO2 emissions
199g/km
129g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.05,500 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.5 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.9 s
8.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.6 s
35.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.3 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.7 s
16.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
240 hp
179 kW
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 has 60 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 60 hp (45 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,700 kg
3,748 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
241 km/h
150 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.07.9 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d8.4 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 3.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
952 km
592 mi
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1,347 km
837 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
241 km/h
150 mph
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
8.4 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.9 s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
8.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0JaguarXF (X260)2.0d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.9 s
8.4 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
1,700 kg
3,748 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
952 km
592 mi
1,347 km
837 mi
CO2 score
199 g/km
129 g/km
Trunk score
-
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km8.58 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi13.80 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal735 L194 US gal162 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year1,286 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0

  • Has 60 hp more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 90 Nm more
  • Is 35 kg lighter
  • Uses 3.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 395 km (245 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 70 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XJ (X351) 2.0
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ Sovereign (X358)4.2 V8
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
2.0
4.2 V8 32V L
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
2.0
6.0 V12 Classic
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0
R 4.0 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXE (X760)2.0d
Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0 vs Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster