Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200dvsJaguar XF (X260) 20d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
20d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.4 s
- Fastest top speed226 km/h140 mph
- Lightest1,631 kg3,596 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.6 L/100 km42.0 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Best economy score94/100
Jaguar XF (X260) 20d
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight106 hp/t79 kW/t9.4 kg/hp
- Best estimated range1,179 km732 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | JaguarXF (X260)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160hp119kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 360Nm266lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,631kg3,596lb | 1,696kg3,739lb |
| Gross weight | 2,341kg5,161lb | 2,340kg5,159lb |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 77.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated | 76.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.4s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.3s Calculated | 36.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.1s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,042km647mi Calculated | 1,179km732mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,999cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | - | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,619mm64in | 1,594mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 116mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 148g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 20d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 3,200 rpm | 1,600-2,600 rpm | 3,450 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | JaguarXF (X260)20d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.3 s | 36.3 s |
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.2 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.1 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 160 hp 119 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 180 hp 134 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) 20d has 20 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d and Jaguar XF (X260) 20d: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 1,631 kg 3,596 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 1,696 kg 3,739 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 8.4 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 8.5 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X260) 20d has more power, Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d and Jaguar XF (X260) 20d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d and Jaguar XF (X260) 20d: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 1,042 km 647 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 1,179 km 732 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 160 hp 119 kW | 8.4 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 180 hp 134 kW | 8.5 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)20d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)20d |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 20d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.4 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)20d | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 200d | JaguarXF (X260)20d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 hp 119 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.4 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 226 km/h 140 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,631 kg 3,596 lb | 1,696 kg 3,739 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,042 km 647 mi | 1,179 km 732 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 148 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 106 hp/t 79 kW/t 9.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d | Jaguar XF (X260) 20d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 9.80 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,470 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 200d
- Is 65 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Lowest power
Jaguar XF (X260) 20d
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 137 km (85 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























