Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 200vsJaguar XF (X260) 20d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018

C 200

184 hp1497 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2018-2021
VS

Jaguar XF (X260)

20d

180 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2019-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 20d

  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.6 L/100 km
    42.0 mpg US
    50.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    148 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,179 km
    732 mi
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    234 km/h
    145 mph
  • Most powerful
    184 hp
    137 kW
  • Lightest
    1,520 kg
    3,351 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    121 hp/t
    90 kW/t
    8.3 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    49/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200JaguarXF (X260)20d
Power
184hp137kW
180hp134kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,520kg3,351lb
1,696kg3,739lb
Gross weight
2,175kg4,795lb
2,340kg5,159lb
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
To 99% top speed
73.3s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
76.1s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
29.6s
Calculated
36.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9L/100 km26.1mpg US31.4mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb
Calculated
106hp/t79kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
184Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
254Nm/t170lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
594km369mi
Calculated
1,179km732mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,497cc91cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,686mm184in
4,954mm195in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,442mm57in
1,457mm57in
Wheelbase
2,840mm112in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,588mm63in
1,605mm63in
Rear track-
1,594mm63in
Ground clearance
92mm4in
116mm5in
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
41L
66L
CO2 emissions
156g/km
148g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200Jaguar XF (X260) 20dPowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 20d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200-1,200-4,000 rpm4,250 rpm
JaguarXF (X260)20d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200JaguarXF (X260)20d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
29.6 s
36.3 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.9 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
7.2 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
153 km/h
95 mph
147 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
184 hp
137 kW
JaguarXF (X260)20d
180 hp
134 kW

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200 has 4 hp more than Jaguar XF (X260) 20d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 20d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
JaguarXF (X260)20d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
1,520 kg
3,351 lb
JaguarXF (X260)20d
1,696 kg
3,739 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
234 km/h
145 mph
JaguarXF (X260)20d
222 km/h
138 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 2008.1 s
JaguarXF (X260)20d8.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200 and Jaguar XF (X260) 20d: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)20d
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 20d and Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
JaguarXF (X260)20d
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
594 km
369 mi
JaguarXF (X260)20d
1,179 km
732 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
184 hp
137 kW
8.1 s
234 km/h
145 mph
JaguarXF (X260)20d
180 hp
134 kW
8.5 s
222 km/h
138 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in
JaguarXF (X260)20d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)20d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
8.1 s
JaguarXF (X260)20d
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
JaguarXF (X260)20d
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200JaguarXF (X260)20d
Power
184 hp
137 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
8.5 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
222 km/h
138 mph
Lightness
1,520 kg
3,351 lb
1,696 kg
3,739 lb
Fuel consumption
6.9 L/100 km
34.1 mpg US
40.9 mpg UK
5.6 L/100 km
42.0 mpg US
50.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,442 mm
56.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Range score
594 km
369 mi
1,179 km
732 mi
CO2 score
156 g/km
148 g/km
Power-to-weight score
121 hp/t
90 kW/t
8.3 kg/hp
106 hp/t
79 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200Jaguar XF (X260) 20d
Consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.08 LC100 km9.80 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.43 LC100 mi15.77 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal840 L222 US gal185 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,811 LC/year1,470 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) Facelift 2018 C 200

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Is 176 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XF (X260) 20d

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 584 km (363 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 8 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) C 200
Jaguar XF (X260) 20d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W205)C 200
20d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)20dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
C 200
C 180
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 180
20d
20d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)20dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)20d
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)Facelift 2018C 200
20d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF (X260)20dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
C 200
C 200
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class Coupe (C205)C 200
20d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)20dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
C 200
C 220d
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class All-TerrainC 220d
20d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)20dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
C 200
C 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzC-class (W205)Facelift 2018C 200vsMercedes-BenzC-class (W203)Facelift 2004C 350 V6
20d
D180
VS
JaguarXF (X260)20dvsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019D180
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W205) · Facelift 2018 C 200 vs Jaguar XF (X260) 20d - car comparison - FastVsFaster