Opel Insignia Sedan (A) · Facelift 2013
Car comparison
Opel Insignia Sedan (A) · Facelift 2013 2.0vsJaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X260)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions154 g/km
- Best estimated range1,088 km676 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Opel Insignia Sedan (A) Facelift 2013 2.0
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,538 kg3,391 lb
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score58/100
Specification comparison
| Model | OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,538kg3,391lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Gross weight | 2,175kg4,795lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 61.7s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 6.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.3s Calculated | 22.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 6.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 14.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 260Nm/t174lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 972km604mi Calculated | 1,088km676mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,842mm191in | 4,954mm195in |
| Width | 1,856mm73in | 1,880mm74in |
| Height | 1,498mm59in | 1,457mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,737mm108in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,590mm63in | 1,594mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,015L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 169g/km | 154g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Opel Insignia Sedan (A) Facelift 2013 2.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 5,300-5,500 rpm | 2,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 6.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 6.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.3 s | 22.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 244 km/h 152 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 14.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 162 km/h 100 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 1,538 kg 3,391 lb |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 244 km/h 152 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Opel Insignia Sedan (A) Facelift 2013 2.0: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 972 km 604 mi |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 1,088 km 676 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.6 s | 244 km/h 152 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | OpelInsignia Sedan (A)Facelift 20132.0 | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 6.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 244 km/h 152 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,538 kg 3,391 lb | 1,635 kg 3,605 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 972 km 604 mi | 1,088 km 676 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 169 g/km | 154 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Opel Insignia Sedan (A) Facelift 2013 2.0 | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Opel Insignia Sedan (A) Facelift 2013 2.0
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 97 kg lighter
- Has 16 km/h (10 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 116 km (72 mi) more estimated range
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
- Emits 15 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























