Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0

250 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2017-2018
VS

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

2.0

240 hp1999 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    244 km/h
    152 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Highest torque
    365 Nm
    269 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,635 kg
    3,605 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    153 hp/t
    114 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    154 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,088 km
    676 mi
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    58/100
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)2.0JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
250hp186kW
240hp179kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
340Nm251lb-ft
Curb weight
1,635kg3,605lb
1,735kg3,825lb
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
To 99% top speed
61.7s99% target: 242 km/h / 150 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.6s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
22.3s
Calculated
28.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.3s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton
Calculated
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,088km676mi
Calculated
952km592mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,954mm195in
5,130mm202in
Width
1,880mm74in
1,899mm75in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
3,032mm119in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,626mm64in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,604mm63in
Trunk volume
540L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
74L
80L
CO2 emissions
154g/km
199g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.05,500 rpm2,000-4,000 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)2.0JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.3 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.6 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
22.3 s
28.6 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
13.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
166 km/h
103 mph
153 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
240 hp
179 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0 and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
340 Nm
251 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,635 kg
3,605 lb
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
1,735 kg
3,825 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
244 km/h
152 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
241 km/h
150 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.06.6 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.07.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,088 km
676 mi
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
952 km
592 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
6.6 s
244 km/h
152 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
240 hp
179 kW
7.9 s
241 km/h
150 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
6.6 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)2.0JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
340 Nm
251 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.6 s
7.9 s
Top speed
244 km/h
152 mph
241 km/h
150 mph
Lightness
1,635 kg
3,605 lb
1,735 kg
3,825 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
1,088 km
676 mi
952 km
592 mi
CO2 score
154 g/km
199 g/km
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
153 hp/t
114 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
138 hp/t
103 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 2.0Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km14.70 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi23.66 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year2,205 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 25 Nm more
  • Is 100 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 136 km (84 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 45 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 2.0

No measurable advantages in the available data.

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Jaguar XJ (X351) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ Sovereign (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
2.0
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0
4.2 V8 32V L
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0
6.0 V12 Classic
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X300)6.0 V12 Classic
2.0
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXF (X260)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)2.0
2.0
R 4.0 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0vsJaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 vs Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster