Jaguar XF (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0vsTesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonTesla Model 3
Long Range 75 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,715 kg3,781 lb
- Best power-to-weight175 hp/t130 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score87/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.3 s
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 287hp214kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,715kg3,781lb | 1,741kg3,838lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,178kg4,802lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 58.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 45.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.8s | 5.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.1s Calculated | 17.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.5s Calculated | 5.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 175hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,028km639mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | - |
| Length | 4,954mm195in | 4,694mm185in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,849mm73in |
| Height | 1,457mm57in | 1,443mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,875mm113in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 425L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | - |
| CO2 emissions | 163g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.5 s | 5.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.8 s | 5.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.1 s | 17.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 8.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.7 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 178 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | 287 hp 214 kW |
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has 13 hp more than Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb |
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | 1,741 kg 3,838 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 5.8 s |
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | 5.3 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has more power, Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 175 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | 287 hp 214 kW | 5.3 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X260)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X260)2.0 | TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 287 hp 214 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.8 s | 5.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb | 1,741 kg 3,838 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,028 km 639 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 163 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 425 L 15.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 175 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 165 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 26 kg lighter
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























