Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0vsTesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X260)

2.0

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2017-2018
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Lightest
    1,715 kg
    3,781 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    175 hp/t
    130 kW/t
    5.7 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    69/100
  • Best performance score
    65/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X260)2.0TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh
Power
300hp224kW
287hp214kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,715kg3,781lb
1,741kg3,838lb
Gross weight-
2,178kg4,802lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
58.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
45.8s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.8s
5.3s
0-200 km/h
18.1s
Calculated
17.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.5s
Calculated
5.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.8s
Calculated
13.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
175hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
165hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,028km639mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
-
Length
4,954mm195in
4,694mm185in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,849mm73in
Height
1,457mm57in
1,443mm57in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,875mm113in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,594mm63in
1,580mm62in
Ground clearance-
140mm6in
Trunk volume
540L
425L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
74L
-
CO2 emissions
163g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X260)2.0TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.5 s
5.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.8 s
5.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.1 s
17.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.2 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
8.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.7 s
11.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.8 s
13.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
176 km/h
109 mph
178 km/h
110 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
300 hp
224 kW
TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh
287 hp
214 kW

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has 13 hp more than Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh.

The biggest power difference is between Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh
1,741 kg
3,838 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.05.8 s
TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh5.3 s

Although Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 has more power, Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh and Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0: 0.5 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
300 hp
224 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh
287 hp
214 kW
5.3 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X260)2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh
Power
287 hp
214 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,694 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X260)2.0TeslaModel 3Long Range 75 kWh
Power
300 hp
224 kW
287 hp
214 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.8 s
5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
225 km/h140 mph
Lightness
1,715 kg
3,781 lb
1,741 kg
3,838 lb
Fuel consumption
7.2 L/100 km
32.7 mpg US
39.2 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,954 mm
195.0 in
Height
1,457 mm
57.4 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Length
4,694 mm
184.8 in
Height
1,443 mm
56.8 in
Range score
1,028 km
639 mi
-
CO2 score
163 g/km
-
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
425 L
15.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
175 hp/t
130 kW/t
5.7 kg/hp
165 hp/t
123 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.28 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,890 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Is 26 kg lighter
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 115 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h

Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh

  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0
Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Jaguar XF (X260) 2.0 vs Tesla Model 3 Long Range 75 kWh - car comparison - FastVsFaster