Car comparison

Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011

R-S 5.0 V8

550 hp5000 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2012-2015
VS

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013

AMG E 63 V8

557 hp5461 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2013-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Most powerful
    557 hp
    415 kW
  • Highest torque
    720 Nm
    531 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,770 kg
    3,902 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    315 hp/t
    235 kW/t
    3.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.8 L/100 km
    24.0 mpg US
    28.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    13.8 L/100 km
    17.0 mpg US
    20.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.5 L/100 km
    31.4 mpg US
    37.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    673 km
    418 mi
  • Best economy score
    81/100

Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph Unrestricted
    300 km/h
    186 mph Restricted
  • Largest trunk
    540 L
  • Best overall score
    84/100
  • Best performance score
    88/100
  • Best practicality score
    77/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
Power
550hp410kW
557hp415kW
Torque
680Nm502lb-ft
720Nm531lb-ft
Curb weight
1,875kg4,134lb
1,770kg3,902lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
2,390kg5,269lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
49.9s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
35.4s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.6s
4.2s
0-200 km/h
11.6s
Calculated
11.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.4s
Calculated
4.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK
13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.2s
Calculated
11.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb
Calculated
315hp/t235kW/t143hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton
Calculated
407Nm/t272lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
604km376mi
Calculated
673km418mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
5,461cc333cu in
Length
4,981mm196in
4,892mm193in
Width
1,939mm76in
1,873mm74in
Height
1,468mm58in
1,450mm57in
Wheelbase
2,909mm115in
2,874mm113in
Front track
1,549mm61in
-
Rear track
1,563mm62in
-
Trunk volume
540L
540L
Max trunk volume
963L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
66L
CO2 emissions
270g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V86,500 rpm2,500-5,500 rpm6,750 rpm
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V85,500 rpm1,750-5,250 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.4 s
4.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.6 s
4.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
11.6 s
11.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.3 s
8.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.4 s
10.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.2 s
11.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
206 km/h
128 mph
202 km/h
126 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
557 hp
415 kW

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8 has 7 hp more than Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8: 7 hp (5 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
720 Nm
531 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
1,770 kg
3,902 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V84.6 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V84.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 1.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
315 hp/t
235 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
604 km
376 mi
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
673 km
418 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
550 hp
410 kW
4.6 s
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
557 hp
415 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,981 mm
196.1 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
Power
557 hp
415 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,892 mm
192.6 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
0-100 km/h4.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
Power
557 hp
415 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
4.6 s
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
4.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
315 hp/t
235 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8
Power
550 hp
410 kW
557 hp
415 kW
Torque
680 Nm
502 lb-ft
720 Nm
531 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.6 s
4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
315 km/h196 mph
Restricted
300 km/h186 mph
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,875 kg
4,134 lb
1,770 kg
3,902 lb
Fuel consumption
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
9.8 L/100 km
24.0 mpg US
28.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,981 mm
196.1 in
Height
1,468 mm
57.8 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Length
4,892 mm
192.6 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Range score
604 km
376 mi
673 km
418 mi
CO2 score
270 g/km
-
Trunk score
540 L
19.1 cu ft
540 L
19.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
293 hp/t
219 kW/t
3.4 kg/hp
315 hp/t
235 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8
Consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK9.8 L/100 km24 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.30 LC100 km17.15 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi32.67 LC100 mi27.60 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal1,470 L388 US gal323 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,045 LC/year2,573 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8

  • Has 7 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 105 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 21 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 69 km (43 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF (X250) R-S 5.0 V8
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) AMG E 63 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X250)R 5.0 V8
AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W212)AMG E 63 V8 BITURBO
R-S 5.0 V8
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X260)S 3.0 V6
AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)AMG E 63 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 63 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)Facelift 2006AMG E 63 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
S 3.0 V6
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)S 3.0 V6
AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 63 S
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)Facelift 2020AMG E 63 S
R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)R 5.0 V8 Supercharged
AMG E 63 V8
AMG E 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W211)AMG E 55 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
R 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 2015R 5.0 V8
AMG E 63 V8
E 450
VS
Mercedes-BenzE-class (W212)Facelift 2013AMG E 63 V8vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W214)E 450
Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 vs Mercedes-Benz E-class (W212) · Facelift 2013 AMG E 63 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster