Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X250) · Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8vsMercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz C-class (W204) · Facelift 2011
AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph Unrestricted300 km/h186 mph Restricted
- Most powerful550 hp410 kW
- Highest torque680 Nm502 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight293 hp/t219 kW/t3.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions270 g/km
- Best estimated range604 km376 mi
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score84/100
- Best performance score88/100
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Lightest1,730 kg3,814 lb
- Lowest highway consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 550hp410kW | 507hp378kW |
| Torque | 680Nm502lb-ft | 610Nm450lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,875kg4,134lb | 1,730kg3,814lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | 2,185kg4,817lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 49.9s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 40.7s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.6s | 4.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 11.6s Calculated | 10.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.4s Calculated | 4.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 18.2L/100 km12.9mpg US15.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.2s Calculated | 11.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated | 293hp/t219kW/t133hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 363Nm/t243lb-ft/ton Calculated | 353Nm/t236lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km376mi Calculated | 550km342mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,000cc305cu in | 6,208cc379cu in |
| Length | 4,981mm196in | - |
| Width | 1,939mm76in | - |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | - |
| Wheelbase | 2,909mm115in | - |
| Front track | 1,549mm61in | - |
| Rear track | 1,563mm62in | - |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 475L |
| Max trunk volume | 963L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 66L |
| CO2 emissions | 270g/km | 280g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 6,500 rpm | 2,500-5,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 6,800 rpm | 5,200 rpm | 8,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.4 s | 4.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.6 s | 4.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 11.6 s | 10.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.3 s | 8.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.4 s | 10.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.2 s | 11.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 206 km/h 128 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW |
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 has 43 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 43 hp (32 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 4.2 s |
Although Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 and Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 604 km 376 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 550 km 342 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 550 hp 410 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 507 hp 378 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8 | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W204)Facelift 2011AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 550 hp 410 kW | 507 hp 378 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 680 Nm 502 lb-ft | 610 Nm 450 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.6 s | 4.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 315 km/h196 mph Restricted 300 km/h186 mph | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,875 kg 4,134 lb | 1,730 kg 3,814 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 376 mi | 550 km 342 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 270 g/km | 280 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 475 L 16.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | 293 hp/t 219 kW/t 3.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8 | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.30 LC100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,045 LC/year | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X250) Facelift 2011 R-S 5.0 V8
- Has 43 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 54 km (34 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W204) Facelift 2011 AMG C 63 AMG Edition 507 V8
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























