Jaguar XF (X250)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8vsVolkswagen Phaeton Long 6.0 W12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Phaeton Long
6.0 W12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lightest1,842 kg4,061 lb
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.7 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Volkswagen Phaeton Long 6.0 W12
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Best estimated range621 km386 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 416hp310kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 560Nm413lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,842kg4,061lb | 2,390kg5,269lb |
| Gross weight | 2,330kg5,137lb | 2,910kg6,415lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 52.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 65.8s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 6.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.1s Calculated | 19.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.2s Calculated | 5.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK | 21.2L/100 km11.1mpg US13.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.3s Calculated | 14.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 556km345mi Calculated | 621km386mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,196cc256cu in | 5,998cc366cu in |
| Length | 4,961mm195in | 5,175mm204in |
| Width | 1,877mm74in | 1,903mm75in |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,450mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,909mm115in | 3,001mm118in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,571mm62in | 1,612mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 500L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Phaeton Long 6.0 W12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.2 s | 5.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 6.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.1 s | 19.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.3 s | 11.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.3 s | 14.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 | 450 hp 336 kW |
Volkswagen Phaeton Long 6.0 W12 has 34 hp more than Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 and Volkswagen Phaeton Long 6.0 W12: 34 hp (25 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 1,842 kg 4,061 lb |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 | 2,390 kg 5,269 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 5.4 s |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 | 6.1 s |
Although Volkswagen Phaeton Long 6.0 W12 has more power, Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 and Volkswagen Phaeton Long 6.0 W12: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 and Volkswagen Phaeton Long 6.0 W12: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 556 km 345 mi |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 | 621 km 386 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 | 450 hp 336 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
| 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 |
| 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | VolkswagenPhaeton Long6.0 W12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 416 hp 310 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 6.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,842 kg 4,061 lb | 2,390 kg 5,269 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 556 km 345 mi | 621 km 386 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 | Volkswagen Phaeton Long 6.0 W12 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 22.05 LC100 km | 25.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 35.49 LC100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,890 L499 US gal416 UK gal | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,308 LC/year | 3,806 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 548 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 38 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volkswagen Phaeton Long 6.0 W12
- Has 34 hp more
- Has 65 km (40 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























