Maserati Quattroporte V
Car comparison
Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32VvsJaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF (X250)
4.2 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Most powerful416 hp310 kW
- Highest torque560 Nm413 lb-ft
- Lightest1,842 kg4,061 lb
- Best power-to-weight226 hp/t168 kW/t4.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.7 L/100 km12.6 mpg US15.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score75/100
- Best performance score74/100
- Best economy score73/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed285 km/h177 mph Unrestricted270 km/h168 mph Restricted
- Best estimated range611 km380 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 416hp310kW |
| Torque | 460Nm339lb-ft | 560Nm413lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,880kg4,145lb | 1,842kg4,061lb |
| Gross weight | 1,990kg4,387lb | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.6s99% target: 282 km/h / 175 mph Calculated | 52.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s | 5.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.8s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 12.6L/100 km18.7mpg US22.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 22L/100 km10.7mpg US12.8mpg UK | 18.7L/100 km12.6mpg US15.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 13.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 213hp/t159kW/t97hp/1000 lb Calculated | 226hp/t168kW/t102hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 245Nm/t164lb-ft/ton Calculated | 304Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 611km380mi Calculated | 556km345mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,244cc259cu in | 4,196cc256cu in |
| Length | 5,097mm201in | 4,961mm195in |
| Width | 1,885mm74in | 1,877mm74in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,460mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 3,064mm121in | 2,909mm115in |
| Front track | 1,582mm62in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,595mm63in | 1,571mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 540L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 90L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 6,250 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 5.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.8 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 11.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 13.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 184 km/h 114 mph | 182 km/h 113 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 400 hp 298 kW |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW |
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 has 16 hp more than Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V and Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 1,842 kg 4,061 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 5.6 s |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 5.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 and Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 and Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 611 km 380 mi |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 556 km 345 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.6 s | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 416 hp 310 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V |
| 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 |
| 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MaseratiQuattroporte V4.2 i V8 32V | JaguarXF (X250)4.2 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 416 hp 310 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 460 Nm 339 lb-ft | 560 Nm 413 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 5.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 285 km/h177 mph Restricted 270 km/h168 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | 1,842 kg 4,061 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.7 L/100 km 16.0 mpg US 19.2 mpg UK | 12.6 L/100 km 18.7 mpg US 22.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 611 km 380 mi | 556 km 345 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 213 hp/t 159 kW/t 4.7 kg/hp | 226 hp/t 168 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V | Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.7 L/100 km16 mpg US19.2 mpg UK | 12.6 L/100 km18.7 mpg US22.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.78 LC100 km | 22.05 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 41.48 LC100 mi | 35.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,210 L584 US gal486 UK gal | 1,890 L499 US gal416 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,867 LC/year | 3,308 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Maserati Quattroporte V 4.2 i V8 32V
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Has 55 km (34 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF (X250) 4.2 V8
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 38 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























