Car comparison

Volvo V90 2.0 T6vsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 3.0d V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volvo V90

2.0 T6

310 hp1969 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2017-2018
VS

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)

3.0d V6

300 hp2993 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 3.0d V6

  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,855 kg
    4,090 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    149 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,158 km
    719 mi
  • Largest trunk
    565 L
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    68/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100

Volvo V90 2.0 T6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.1 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    310 hp
    231 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    164 hp/t
    122 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolvoV902.0 T6JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
Power
310hp231kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
1,890kg4,167lb
1,855kg4,090lb
Gross weight
2,400kg5,291lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
67.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
75.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.1s
6.6s
0-200 km/h
19.9s
Calculated
21.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.8s
Calculated
6.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.9L/100 km23.8mpg US28.5mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
14.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
164hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
212Nm/t142lb-ft/ton
Calculated
377Nm/t252lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
779km484mi
Calculated
1,158km719mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,969cc120cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,936mm194in
4,955mm195in
Width
1,879mm74in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,475mm58in
1,496mm59in
Wheelbase
2,941mm116in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,628mm64in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,629mm64in
1,607mm63in
Ground clearance-
110mm4in
Trunk volume
560L
565L
Max trunk volume-
1,700L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
66L
CO2 emissions
179g/km
149g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volvo V90 2.0 T6Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 3.0d V6PowerTorque
  • Volvo V90 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolvoV902.0 T65,700 rpm2,200-5,100 rpm5,950 rpm
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V64,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolvoV902.0 T6JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.8 s
6.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.1 s
6.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.9 s
21.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.9 s
12.3 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
170 km/h
106 mph
165 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW

Volvo V90 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 3.0d V6.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 3.0d V6 and Volvo V90 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T6
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T6
1,890 kg
4,167 lb
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
1,855 kg
4,090 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T66.1 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V66.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 T6 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 3.0d V6: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T6
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 3.0d V6 and Volvo V90 2.0 T6: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T6
164 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolvoV902.0 T6
779 km
484 mi
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
1,158 km
719 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolvoV902.0 T6
310 hp
231 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW
6.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolvoV902.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,936 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolvoV902.0 T6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolvoV902.0 T6
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
6.1 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
6.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolvoV902.0 T6
164 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolvoV902.0 T6JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6
Power
310 hp
231 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.1 s
6.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,890 kg
4,167 lb
1,855 kg
4,090 lb
Fuel consumption
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,936 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
Range score
779 km
484 mi
1,158 km
719 mi
CO2 score
179 g/km
149 g/km
Trunk score
560 L
19.8 cu ft
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
164 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
162 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolvo V90 2.0 T6Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 3.0d V6
Consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.48 LC100 km9.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi21.69 LC100 mi16.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal855 L226 US gal188 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,021 LC/year1,496 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volvo V90 2.0 T6

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 3.0d V6

  • Has 300 Nm more
  • Is 35 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 379 km (235 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 30 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volvo V90 2.0 T6
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 3.0d V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 T6
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoV902.0 T6vsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20133.0 T6
3.0d V6
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 T6
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoV902.0 T6vsVolvoV70 III3.0 T6
3.0d V6
3.0d V6
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF (X260)3.0d V6
2.0 T6
3.0 TDI
VS
VolvoV902.0 T6vsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20163.0 TDI
3.0d V6
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 T6
R 2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoV902.0 T6vsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantFacelift 2017R 2.0 TSI
3.0d V6
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0 T6
Cupra 2.0 TSI
VS
VolvoV902.0 T6vsSeatLeon III STFacelift 2016Cupra 2.0 TSI
3.0d V6
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6vsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0 T6
30t
VS
VolvoV902.0 T6vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)30t
3.0d V6
2.0 TSI
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)3.0d V6vsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TSI
Volvo V90 2.0 T6 vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 3.0d V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster