Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0ivsVolvo V90 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,726 kg3,805 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Volvo V90 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range882 km548 mi
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,726kg3,805lb | 1,871kg4,125lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 74.3s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 73.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.2s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 187Nm/t125lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 813km505mi Calculated | 882km548mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,964mm195in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,982mm78in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,494mm59in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | - | 153mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 745L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,724L | 1,526L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 159g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.2 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,726 kg 3,805 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 1,871 kg 4,125 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 7.1 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 T5 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 T5 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 813 km 505 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 882 km 548 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T5 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V90 2.0 T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | VolvoV902.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,726 kg 3,805 lb | 1,871 kg 4,125 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 813 km 505 mi | 882 km 548 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 159 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i | Volvo V90 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 185 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Volvo V90 2.0 T5
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 69 km (43 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























