Skoda Superb IV Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSIvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020
2.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful265 hp198 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score72/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score85/100
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Lightest1,726 kg3,805 lb
- Best estimated range813 km505 mi
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265hp198kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,824kg4,021lb | 1,726kg3,805lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 71.6s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 18.6s Calculated | 25.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.7s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 219Nm/t147lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 805km500mi Calculated | 813km505mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,902mm193in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,849mm73in | - |
| Height | 1,482mm58in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,841mm112in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,580mm62in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,566mm62in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 139mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 690L | 745L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,920L | 1,724L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 74L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,650-4,350 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,300-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 18.6 s | 25.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.7 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 174 km/h 108 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW |
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI has 15 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI: 15 hp (11 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 1,824 kg 4,021 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,726 kg 3,805 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 5.7 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 805 km 500 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 813 km 505 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 265 hp 198 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaSuperb IV Combi2.0 TSI | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 hp 198 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,824 kg 4,021 lb | 1,726 kg 3,805 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 805 km 500 mi | 813 km 505 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 690 L 24.4 cu ft | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 15.92 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 2,389 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Superb IV Combi 2.0 TSI
- Has 15 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 19 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Is 98 kg lighter
- Has 8 km (5 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























