Volvo V90
Car comparison
Volvo V90 2.0 T6vsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0i
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020
2.0i
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V90 2.0 T6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful310 hp231 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range769 km478 mi
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score86/100
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Lightest1,805 kg3,979 lb
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk745 L
- Best overall score72/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV902.0 T6 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 310hp231kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,956kg4,312lb | 1,805kg3,979lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.2s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.1s Calculated | 21.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 5.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.1s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 204Nm/t137lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 769km478mi Calculated | 763km474mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,936mm194in | 4,964mm195in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,982mm78in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,494mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 560L | 745L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,526L | 1,724L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 181g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V90 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,220-5,100 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV902.0 T6 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 5.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.1 s | 21.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.1 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 105 mph | 167 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW |
Volvo V90 2.0 T6 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i and Volvo V90 2.0 T6: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 1,956 kg 4,312 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 250 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 6.1 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 6.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 T6 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 T6 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 769 km 478 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 763 km 474 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 310 hp 231 kW | 6.1 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.2 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 |
| 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i |
| 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo V90 2.0 T6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 T6 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV902.0 T6 | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 310 hp 231 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,956 kg 4,312 lb | 1,805 kg 3,979 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km 24.2 mpg US 29.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 769 km 478 mi | 763 km 474 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 181 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | 745 L 26.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 166 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V90 2.0 T6 | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK | 9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km | 16.97 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi | 27.32 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal | 1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year | 2,546 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V90 2.0 T6
- Has 10 hp more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 6 km (4 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
- Is 151 kg lighter
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 185 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























