Car comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0i

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019

2.0 TSI

280 hp1984 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2020-2023
VS

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020

2.0i

300 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2020-2024

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.3 L/100 km
    32.2 mpg US
    38.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    904 km
    562 mi
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best performance score
    64/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Power
280hp209kW
300hp224kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,808kg3,986lb
1,805kg3,979lb
Gross weight
2,318kg5,110lb
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
60.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
67.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.3s
6.2s
0-200 km/h
17.6s
Calculated
20.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.1s
Calculated
5.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
13.3s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
166hp/t124kW/t75hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
221Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
222Nm/t148lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
904km562mi
Calculated
763km474mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,862mm191in
4,964mm195in
Width
1,864mm73in
-
Height
1,511mm59in
1,494mm59in
Wheelbase
2,836mm112in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,586mm62in
1,602mm63in
Rear track
1,574mm62in
1,604mm63in
Trunk volume
660L
745L
Max trunk volume
1,950L
1,724L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
74L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0iPowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI4,950-6,600 rpm2,000-4,900 rpm6,850 rpm
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i5,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.1 s
5.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.3 s
6.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.6 s
20.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.8 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.3 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.3 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
177 km/h
110 mph
170 km/h
106 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i has 20 hp more than Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
1,808 kg
3,986 lb
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
1,805 kg
3,979 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i has more power, Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i: 2.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
166 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
280 hp
209 kW
5.3 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
300 hp
224 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
745 L
26.3 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
Power
280 hp
209 kW
0-100 km/h5.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
5.3 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
6.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSI
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
166 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb III CombiFacelift 20192.0 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
Power
280 hp
209 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.3 s
6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,808 kg
3,986 lb
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
Fuel consumption
7.3 L/100 km
32.2 mpg US
38.7 mpg UK
9.7 L/100 km
24.2 mpg US
29.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,862 mm
191.4 in
Height
1,511 mm
59.5 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
745 L
26.3 cu ft
Length
4,964 mm
195.4 in
Height
1,494 mm
58.8 in
Range score
904 km
562 mi
763 km
474 mi
Trunk score
660 L
23.3 cu ft
745 L
26.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
166 hp/t
124 kW/t
6.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i
Consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK9.7 L/100 km24.2 mpg US29.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.78 LC100 km16.97 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.56 LC100 mi27.32 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal1,455 L384 US gal320 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,916 LC/year2,546 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Combi Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI

  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 141 km (88 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) Facelift 2020 2.0i

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Is 3 kg lighter
  • Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 85 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TSI
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0i
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Skoda Superb III Combi · Facelift 2019 2.0 TSI vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) · Facelift 2020 2.0i - car comparison - FastVsFaster