Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSIvsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi

1.8 TSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedWagon / estate2013-2017
VS

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)

2.0d

180 hp1999 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    227 km/h
    141 mph
  • Most powerful
    180 hp
    134 kW
  • Lightest
    1,375 kg
    3,031 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    131 hp/t
    98 kW/t
    7.6 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    610 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

  • Highest torque
    430 Nm
    317 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    124 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,375 km
    854 mi
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
180hp134kW
180hp134kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
430Nm317lb-ft
Curb weight
1,375kg3,031lb
1,720kg3,792lb
Gross weight
2,013kg4,438lb
-
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
69.5s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
86.7s99% target: 219 km/h / 136 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
30.3s
Calculated
40.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb
Calculated
105hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton
Calculated
250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
821km510mi
Calculated
1,375km854mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,798cc110cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,659mm183in
4,955mm195in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,987mm78in
Height
1,465mm58in
1,496mm59in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,960mm117in
Front track
1,543mm61in
1,605mm63in
Rear track
1,512mm60in
1,607mm63in
Ground clearance
140mm6in
116mm5in
Trunk volume
610L
565L
Max trunk volume
1,740L
1,700L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
66L
CO2 emissions
156g/km
124g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI4,500-6,200 rpm1,350-4,500 rpm6,450 rpm
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
30.3 s
40.8 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.8 s
330 ft
101 m
6.9 s
7.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.8 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
154 km/h
96 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
430 Nm
317 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
1,375 kg
3,031 lb
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1,720 kg
3,792 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
227 km/h
141 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
221 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI7.5 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: 1.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d and Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI: 1.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
821 km
510 mi
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1,375 km
854 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
7.5 s
227 km/h
141 mph
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
180 hp
134 kW
8.8 s
221 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,659 mm
183.4 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
221 km/h
137 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
7.5 s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
180 hp
134 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
430 Nm
317 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
8.8 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
221 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,375 kg
3,031 lb
1,720 kg
3,792 lb
Fuel consumption
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,659 mm
183.4 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
Range score
821 km
510 mi
1,375 km
854 mi
CO2 score
156 g/km
124 g/km
Trunk score
610 L
21.5 cu ft
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
131 hp/t
98 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
105 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSIJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.73 LC100 km8.40 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi18.87 LC100 mi13.52 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal720 L190 US gal158 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,759 LC/year1,260 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI

  • Is 345 kg lighter
  • Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 26 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 45 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 554 km (344 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 32 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.8 TSI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0d
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIvsSeatLeon X-Perience1.8 TSI
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
1.8 TSI
1.8 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20141.8 TFSI
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)1.8 TSI
2.0d
1.6
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsSubaruLevorg1.6
Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI vs Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster