Car comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0dvsVolvo V90 2.0 T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)

2.0d

240 hp1999 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018
VS

Volvo V90

2.0 T5

250 hp1969 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    241 km/h
    150 mph
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.8 L/100 km
    40.6 mpg US
    48.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    153 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,138 km
    707 mi
  • Largest trunk
    565 L
  • Best overall score
    68/100
  • Best performance score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    87/100

Volvo V90 2.0 T5

  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Lightest
    1,796 kg
    3,960 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    139 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dVolvoV902.0 T5
Power
240hp179kW
250hp186kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,805kg3,979lb
1,796kg3,960lb
Gross weight-
2,300kg5,071lb
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
71.8s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
72.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
25.0s
Calculated
25.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
14.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,138km707mi
Calculated
809km503mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,955mm195in
4,936mm194in
Width
1,987mm78in
1,879mm74in
Height
1,496mm59in
1,475mm58in
Wheelbase
2,960mm117in
2,941mm116in
Front track
1,605mm63in
1,628mm64in
Rear track
1,607mm63in
1,629mm64in
Ground clearance
116mm5in
-
Trunk volume
565L
560L
Max trunk volume
1,700L
-
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
55L
CO2 emissions
153g/km
157g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0dVolvo V90 2.0 T5PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d: Power / Torque
  • Volvo V90 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d4,000 rpm1,500 rpm4,250 rpm
VolvoV902.0 T55,500 rpm1,800-4,800 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dVolvoV902.0 T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
25.0 s
25.8 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
14.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
160 km/h
100 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
240 hp
179 kW
VolvoV902.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW

Volvo V90 2.0 T5 has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d and Volvo V90 2.0 T5: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
VolvoV902.0 T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
VolvoV902.0 T5
1,796 kg
3,960 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
241 km/h
150 mph
VolvoV902.0 T5
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d6.7 s
VolvoV902.0 T57.0 s

Although Volvo V90 2.0 T5 has more power, Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d and Volvo V90 2.0 T5: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolvoV902.0 T5
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d and Volvo V90 2.0 T5: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
VolvoV902.0 T5
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
1,138 km
707 mi
VolvoV902.0 T5
809 km
503 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
240 hp
179 kW
6.7 s
241 km/h
150 mph
VolvoV902.0 T5
250 hp
186 kW
7.0 s
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
VolvoV902.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,936 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolvoV902.0 T5
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
6.7 s
VolvoV902.0 T5
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0d
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
VolvoV902.0 T5
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dVolvoV902.0 T5
Power
240 hp
179 kW
250 hp
186 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.0 s
Top speed
241 km/h
150 mph
Unrestricted
240 km/h149 mph
Restricted
230 km/h143 mph
Lightness
1,805 kg
3,979 lb
1,796 kg
3,960 lb
Fuel consumption
5.8 L/100 km
40.6 mpg US
48.7 mpg UK
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
565 L
20.0 cu ft
Length
4,955 mm
195.1 in
Height
1,496 mm
58.9 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Length
4,936 mm
194.3 in
Height
1,475 mm
58.1 in
Range score
1,138 km
707 mi
809 km
503 mi
CO2 score
153 g/km
157 g/km
Trunk score
565 L
20.0 cu ft
560 L
19.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
133 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.5 kg/hp
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0dVolvo V90 2.0 T5
Consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.15 LC100 km11.90 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.33 LC100 mi19.15 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used870 L230 US gal191 UK gal1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,523 LC/year1,785 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d

  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 329 km (204 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 5 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 4 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Volvo V90 2.0 T5

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Is 9 kg lighter
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d
Volvo V90 2.0 T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoV902.0 T5vsVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
2.0d
2.0d
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)2.0d
2.0 T5
2.4 D5
VS
VolvoV902.0 T5vsVolvoXC70 IIFacelift 20132.4 D5
2.0d
2.0i
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
2.0 T5
2.0
VS
VolvoV902.0 T5vsJaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0
2.0d
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)5.0 V8
2.0 T5
2.0 TFSI
VS
VolvoV902.0 T5vsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20162.0 TFSI
2.0d
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsJaguarXF (X250)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
2.0 T5
2.0 BiTDI
VS
VolvoV902.0 T5vsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 BiTDI
2.0 T5
CLS 350d V6
VS
VolvoV902.0 T5vsMercedes-BenzCLS Shooting Brake (X218)Facelift 2014CLS 350d V6
2.0d
2.0 BiTDI
VS
JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0dvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 BiTDI
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0d vs Volvo V90 2.0 T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster