Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
Car comparison
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0vsVolvo V90 2.0 T5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo V90
2.0 T5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0
- Fastest top speed241 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful250 hp186 kW
- Highest torque365 Nm269 lb-ft
- Lightest1,705 kg3,759 lb
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions155 g/km
- Best estimated range1,088 km676 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Volvo V90 2.0 T5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 1,796kg3,960lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,300kg5,071lb |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.6s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 72.1s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.0s Calculated | 25.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.8s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,088km676mi Calculated | 809km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,955mm195in | 4,936mm194in |
| Width | 1,987mm78in | 1,879mm74in |
| Height | 1,496mm59in | 1,475mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,960mm117in | 2,941mm116in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,628mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,607mm63in | 1,629mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 110mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 560L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,700L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 155g/km | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volvo V90 2.0 T5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 5,500 rpm | 1,800-4,800 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.0 s | 25.8 s |
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 159 km/h 99 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 7.1 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 7.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V90 2.0 T5 and Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 1,088 km 676 mi |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 809 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoV902.0 T5 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| VolvoV902.0 T5 | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | VolvoV902.0 T5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 241 km/h 150 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | 1,796 kg 3,960 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,088 km 676 mi | 809 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 155 g/km | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 | Volvo V90 2.0 T5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0
- Has 15 Nm more
- Is 91 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 279 km (174 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Volvo V90 2.0 T5
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























