Opel Insignia Sports Tourer (B)
Car comparison
Opel Insignia Sports Tourer (B) 2.0 TurbovsJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XF Sportbrake (X260)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Opel Insignia Sports Tourer (B) 2.0 Turbo
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful260 hp194 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,608 kg3,545 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score57/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions155 g/km
- Best estimated range1,088 km676 mi
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,608kg3,545lb | 1,705kg3,759lb |
| Gross weight | 2,295kg5,060lb | - |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.4s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 73.6s99% target: 239 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 26.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 147hp/t109kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 249Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated | 214Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 713km443mi Calculated | 1,088km676mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,986mm196in | 4,955mm195in |
| Width | 1,863mm73in | 1,987mm78in |
| Height | 1,500mm59in | 1,496mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,829mm111in | 2,960mm117in |
| Front track | 1,607mm63in | 1,605mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,610mm63in | 1,607mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 110mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 560L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,665L | 1,700L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 74L |
| CO2 emissions | 199g/km | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Opel Insignia Sports Tourer (B) 2.0 Turbo: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | 5,300 rpm | 2,500-4,000 rpm | 5,550 rpm |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 26.1 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | 260 hp 194 kW |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Opel Insignia Sports Tourer (B) 2.0 Turbo has 10 hp more than Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 and Opel Insignia Sports Tourer (B) 2.0 Turbo: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | 1,608 kg 3,545 lb |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 241 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 7.1 s |
Although Opel Insignia Sports Tourer (B) 2.0 Turbo has more power, Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 and Opel Insignia Sports Tourer (B) 2.0 Turbo: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 and Opel Insignia Sports Tourer (B) 2.0 Turbo: 1.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | 713 km 443 mi |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 1,088 km 676 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | 260 hp 194 kW | 7.5 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 7.1 s | 241 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo |
| 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK |
| JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | OpelInsignia Sports Tourer (B)2.0 Turbo | JaguarXF Sportbrake (X260)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 241 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,608 kg 3,545 lb | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.7 L/100 km 27.0 mpg US 32.5 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 713 km 443 mi | 1,088 km 676 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 199 g/km | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 147 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Opel Insignia Sports Tourer (B) 2.0 Turbo | Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.22 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.50 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,284 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Opel Insignia Sports Tourer (B) 2.0 Turbo
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 97 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XF Sportbrake (X260) 2.0
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 376 km (233 mi) more estimated range
- Has 5 L more trunk volume
- Emits 44 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























