Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0dvsToyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014 2.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonToyota Camry VII (XV50) · Facelift 2014
2.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph Unrestricted225 km/h140 mph Restricted
- Highest torque430 Nm317 lb-ft
- Lowest CO2 emissions111 g/km
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score52/100
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5
- Most powerful181 hp135 kW
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk506 L
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score76/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 181hp135kW |
| Torque | 430Nm317lb-ft | 231Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | 2,135kg4,707lb | 2,100kg4,630lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 73.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 76.0s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 9.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.7s Calculated | 38.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 8.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 124hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t186lb-ft/ton Calculated | 158Nm/t106lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 897km558mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,999cc122cu in | 2,494cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,850mm191in |
| Width | 1,850mm73in | 1,825mm72in |
| Height | 1,416mm56in | 1,480mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,775mm109in |
| Front track | - | 1,575mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,565mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 506L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 56L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 111g/km | 183g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d: Power / Torque
- Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 6,000 rpm | 4,100 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 8.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 9.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.7 s | 38.3 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 3.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 11.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 14.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 181 hp 135 kW |
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5 has 1 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 231 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 7.8 s |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 9.0 s |
Although Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5 has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d and Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5: 1.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.8 s | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph |
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | 181 hp 135 kW | 9.0 s | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0d | ToyotaCamry VII (XV50)Facelift 20142.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 181 hp 135 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | 231 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 9.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 235 km/h146 mph Restricted 225 km/h140 mph | Unrestricted 220 km/h137 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 7.8 L/100 km 30.2 mpg US 36.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 897 km 558 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 111 g/km | 183 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 506 L 17.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.6 kg/hp | 124 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.65 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.97 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,170 L309 US gal257 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,048 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0d
- Has 199 Nm more
- Is 1.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Emits 72 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Toyota Camry VII (XV50) Facelift 2014 2.5
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 85 kg lighter
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 51 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























