Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220dvsJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020 2.0d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760) · Facelift 2020
2.0d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed239 km/h149 mph
- Highest torque440 Nm325 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk455 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score74/100
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,704 kg3,757 lb
- Best power-to-weight120 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Best estimated range949 km590 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 440Nm325lb-ft | 430Nm317lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,705kg3,759lb | 1,704kg3,757lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | - |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 68.1s99% target: 237 km/h / 147 mph Calculated | 69.5s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.9s Calculated | 29.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 120hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 258Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 252Nm/t169lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 833km518mi Calculated | 949km590mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,993cc122cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,751mm187in | 4,678mm184in |
| Width | 1,820mm72in | 1,967mm77in |
| Height | 1,437mm57in | 1,410mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,865mm113in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,582mm62in | 1,608mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,594mm63in | 1,606mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 356L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,236L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 56L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 4,200 rpm | 1,800-2,800 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 4,250 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.9 s | 29.1 s |
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 159 km/h 99 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 200 hp 149 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d has 4 hp more than Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 7.4 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 7.5 s |
Although Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d has more power, Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d and Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 833 km 518 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 949 km 590 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.4 s | 239 km/h 149 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.5 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzC-class (W206)C 220d | JaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | 430 Nm 317 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 239 km/h 149 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,705 kg 3,759 lb | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 833 km 518 mi | 949 km 590 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 356 L 12.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 120 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d | Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz C-class (W206) C 220d
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 99 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Jaguar XE (X760) Facelift 2020 2.0d
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 1 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 116 km (72 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























