Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0vsMercedes-Benz S-class (W222) S 350d
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz S-class (W222)
S 350d
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W222) S 350d
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Highest torque620 Nm457 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,186 km737 mi
- Largest trunk510 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score65/100
- Best economy score91/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.3 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Best practicality score73/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 250hp186kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 365Nm269lb-ft | 620Nm457lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,540kg3,395lb | 1,880kg4,145lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,655kg5,853lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 63.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 68.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.3s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.5s Calculated | 20.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.0s Calculated | 6.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated | 330Nm/t221lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,186km737mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 2,987cc182cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 5,116mm201in |
| Width | - | 1,899mm75in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,496mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 3,035mm119in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,624mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | 1,637mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 455L | 510L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz S-class (W222) S 350d: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d | 3,400 rpm | 1,600-2,400 rpm | 3,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.0 s | 6.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.5 s | 20.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.5 s | 9.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.1 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d | 258 hp 192 kW |
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W222) S 350d has 8 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz S-class (W222) S 350d: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d | 6.5 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz S-class (W222) S 350d has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz S-class (W222) S 350d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d | 1,186 km 737 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d | 258 hp 192 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W222) S 350d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Mercedes-BenzS-class (W222)S 350d | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 250 hp 186 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | 620 Nm 457 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.3 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | 1,880 kg 4,145 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,186 km 737 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | 510 L 18.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 | Mercedes-Benz S-class (W222) S 350d |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.03 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,654 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Is 340 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz S-class (W222) S 350d
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 255 Nm more
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 186 km (116 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























