Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0d V6vsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Highest torque700 Nm516 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight163 hp/t122 kW/t6.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,351 km839 mi
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Lightest1,540 kg3,395 lb
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 700Nm516lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,835kg4,045lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 2,400kg5,291lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 67.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 63.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.2s | 6.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 20.1s Calculated | 19.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.9s Calculated | 6.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 381Nm/t255lb-ft/ton Calculated | 237Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,351km839mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,993cc183cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 5,130mm202in | 4,672mm184in |
| Width | 1,899mm75in | - |
| Height | 1,460mm57in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 3,032mm119in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | 1,626mm64in | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,603mm63in |
| Trunk volume | - | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 77L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 149g/km | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.2 s | 6.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 20.1 s | 19.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 170 km/h 105 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW |
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 has 50 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 6.2 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 1,351 km 839 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.3 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.2 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 6.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.2 s | 6.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,835 kg 4,045 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,351 km 839 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 149 g/km | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 455 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 335 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 351 km (218 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Is 295 kg lighter
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























