Jaguar XE (X760)
Car comparison
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0vsVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013 2.0 T6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo S60 II · Facelift 2013
2.0 T6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,620 kg3,571 lb
- Best power-to-weight185 hp/t138 kW/t5.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK
- Largest trunk415 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score88/100
- Best practicality score72/100
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6
- Most powerful306 hp228 kW
- Best estimated range978 km608 mi
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300hp224kW | 306hp228kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,620kg3,571lb | 1,660kg3,660lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,180kg4,806lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 54.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 58.6s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.5s | 5.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.0s Calculated | 18.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.3s Calculated | 5.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 13.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 185hp/t138kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated | 184hp/t137kW/t84hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 247Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 913km567mi Calculated | 978km608mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,686mm184in | 4,635mm182in |
| Width | 1,967mm77in | 1,865mm73in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,484mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,835mm112in | 2,776mm109in |
| Front track | 1,602mm63in | 1,578mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,603mm63in | 1,575mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 415L | 380L |
| Max trunk volume | 455L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 63L | 68L |
| CO2 emissions | 157g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 5,700 rpm | 2,100-4,800 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.3 s | 5.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.5 s | 5.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.0 s | 18.2 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.0 s | 9.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 13.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 175 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 306 hp 228 kW |
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 has 6 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5.5 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 5.9 s |
Although Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 913 km 567 mi |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 978 km 608 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 306 hp 228 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | VolvoS60 IIFacelift 20132.0 T6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp 224 kW | 306 hp 228 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.5 s | 5.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,620 kg 3,571 lb | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 913 km 567 mi | 978 km 608 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 157 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 415 L 14.7 cu ft | 380 L 13.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 185 hp/t 138 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | 184 hp/t 137 kW/t 5.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 | Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 12.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,811 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Is 40 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 35 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Volvo S60 II Facelift 2013 2.0 T6
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 65 km (41 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























