Car comparison

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0vsJaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0d V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XE (X760)

2.0

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSedan2017-2018
VS

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

3.0d V6

300 hp2993 ccDieselRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2015-2019

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6

  • Most powerful
    300 hp
    224 kW
  • Highest torque
    700 Nm
    516 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    163 hp/t
    122 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    149 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,351 km
    839 mi
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    68/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,595 kg
    3,516 lb

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXE (X760)2.0JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
Power
250hp186kW
300hp224kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
700Nm516lb-ft
Curb weight
1,595kg3,516lb
1,835kg4,045lb
Gross weight-
2,400kg5,291lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
64.4s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
67.8s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.2s
6.2s
0-200 km/h
19.6s
Calculated
20.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.9s
Calculated
5.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.1s
Calculated
14.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb
Calculated
163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
229Nm/t153lb-ft/ton
Calculated
381Nm/t255lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
926km576mi
Calculated
1,351km839mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
2,993cc183cu in
Length
4,672mm184in
5,130mm202in
Width
1,967mm77in
1,899mm75in
Height
1,425mm56in
1,460mm57in
Wheelbase
2,835mm112in
3,032mm119in
Front track
1,602mm63in
1,626mm64in
Rear track
1,603mm63in
1,604mm63in
Trunk volume
455L
-
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
77L
CO2 emissions
154g/km
149g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXE (X760)2.05,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V64,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXE (X760)2.0JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.9 s
5.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.2 s
6.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
19.6 s
20.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.4 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.4 s
9.4 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.0 s
12.0 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.1 s
14.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
171 km/h
106 mph
170 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 has 50 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6: 50 hp (37 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
700 Nm
516 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
1,835 kg
4,045 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.06.2 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V66.2 s

Although Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 1.1 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
926 km
576 mi
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
1,351 km
839 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
250 hp
186 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
300 hp
224 kW
6.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
6.2 s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
6.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXE (X760)2.0JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
Power
250 hp
186 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.2 s
6.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,595 kg
3,516 lb
1,835 kg
4,045 lb
Fuel consumption
6.8 L/100 km
34.6 mpg US
41.5 mpg UK
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
455 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,672 mm
183.9 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Range score
926 km
576 mi
1,351 km
839 mi
CO2 score
154 g/km
149 g/km
Trunk score
455 L
16.1 cu ft
-
Power-to-weight score
157 hp/t
117 kW/t
6.4 kg/hp
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XE (X760) 2.0Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6
Consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.90 LC100 km9.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi19.15 LC100 mi16.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal855 L226 US gal188 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,785 LC/year1,496 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0

  • Is 240 kg lighter

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0d V6

  • Has 50 hp more
  • Has 335 Nm more
  • Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 424 km (264 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 5 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Jaguar XJ (X351) 3.0d V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0
P250
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P250
3.0d V6
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6vsJaguarXJ Sovereign (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i
3.0d V6
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6vsJaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
3.0d V6
4.2 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20152.0
3.0d V6
R 4.0 24V Sport
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6vsJaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
3.0d V6
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
2.0
E 300
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsMercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 300
3.0d V6
R 4.0 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6vsJaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 vs Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0d V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster