Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350vsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar XE (X760)
2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.7 s
- Most powerful300 hp224 kW
- Lightest1,565 kg3,450 lb
- Best power-to-weight192 hp/t143 kW/t5.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions153 g/km
- Best estimated range940 km584 mi
- Best performance score66/100
- Best economy score89/100
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350
- Fastest top speed265 km/h165 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Largest trunk540 L
- Best overall score69/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299hp223kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,565kg3,450lb |
| Gross weight | 2,395kg5,280lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.0s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated | 56.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.9s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.9s Calculated | 17.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.6s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 180hp/t134kW/t82hp/1000 lb Calculated | 192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 241Nm/t161lb-ft/ton Calculated | 256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 892km554mi Calculated | 940km584mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,923mm194in | 4,686mm184in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,967mm77in |
| Height | 1,468mm58in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,939mm116in | 2,835mm112in |
| Front track | - | 1,602mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,603mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 103mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 540L | 415L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 455L |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 66L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 169g/km | 153g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350: Power / Torque
- Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | - | 3,000-4,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.6 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.9 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.9 s | 17.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.8 s | 11.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 177 km/h 110 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 299 hp 223 kW |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 has 1 hp more than Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350 and Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 5.9 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 892 km 554 mi |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 940 km 584 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 299 hp 223 kW | 5.9 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.7 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 5.9 s |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzE-class (W213)E 350 | JaguarXE (X760)2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp 223 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.9 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,565 kg 3,450 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 892 km 554 mi | 940 km 584 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 169 g/km | 153 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | 415 L 14.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 180 hp/t 134 kW/t 5.6 kg/hp | 192 hp/t 143 kW/t 5.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350 | Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz E-class (W213) E 350
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 125 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 95 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 48 km (30 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























