Car comparison

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0 V6vsJaguar XE (X760) 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015

3.0 V6

340 hp2995 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedSedan2015-2018
VS

Jaguar XE (X760)

2.0

300 hp1997 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTurbochargedSedan2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6

  • Fastest top speed
    265 km/h
    165 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    340 hp
    254 kW
  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    193 hp/t
    144 kW/t
    5.2 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    67/100
  • Best practicality score
    78/100

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.7 s
  • Lightest
    1,565 kg
    3,450 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    153 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    940 km
    584 mi
  • Best economy score
    89/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
340hp254kW
300hp224kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,765kg3,891lb
1,565kg3,450lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
62.9s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph
Calculated
56.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.9s
5.7s
0-200 km/h
18.3s
Calculated
17.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.6s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.9s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
193hp/t144kW/t87hp/1000 lb
Calculated
192hp/t143kW/t87hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
879km546mi
Calculated
940km584mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,995cc183cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
5,130mm202in
4,686mm184in
Width
1,899mm75in
1,967mm77in
Height
1,460mm57in
1,425mm56in
Wheelbase
3,032mm119in
2,835mm112in
Front track
1,626mm64in
1,602mm63in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,603mm63in
Trunk volume-
415L
Max trunk volume-
455L
Doors
4
4
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
80L
63L
CO2 emissions
211g/km
153g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0PowerTorque
  • Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: Power / Torque
  • Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V66,500 rpm3,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
JaguarXE (X760)2.05,500 rpm1,500-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.6 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.9 s
5.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
18.3 s
17.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.3 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.2 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.8 s
11.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.9 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
175 km/h
109 mph
177 km/h
110 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
340 hp
254 kW
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
300 hp
224 kW

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 has 40 hp more than Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
1,765 kg
3,891 lb
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
1,565 kg
3,450 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V65.9 s
JaguarXE (X760)2.05.7 s

Although Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 has more power, Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 and Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6: 2.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
879 km
546 mi
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
940 km
584 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
340 hp
254 kW
5.9 s
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
300 hp
224 kW
5.7 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
415 L
14.7 cu ft
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
Power
340 hp
254 kW
0-100 km/h5.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
5.9 s
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
5.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
JaguarXE (X760)2.0
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6JaguarXE (X760)2.0
Power
340 hp
254 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.9 s
5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
265 km/h165 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,765 kg
3,891 lb
1,565 kg
3,450 lb
Fuel consumption
9.1 L/100 km
25.8 mpg US
31.0 mpg UK
6.7 L/100 km
35.1 mpg US
42.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk-
Length
5,130 mm
202.0 in
Height
1,460 mm
57.5 in
Doors/seats
4 doors
5 seats
Trunk
415 L
14.7 cu ft
Length
4,686 mm
184.5 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
Range score
879 km
546 mi
940 km
584 mi
CO2 score
211 g/km
153 g/km
Trunk score
-
415 L
14.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
193 hp/t
144 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
192 hp/t
143 kW/t
5.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.92 LC100 km11.73 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi25.63 LC100 mi18.87 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,389 LC/year1,759 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar XJ (X351) Facelift 2015 3.0 V6

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0

  • Is 200 kg lighter
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 61 km (38 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 58 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar XJ (X351) 3.0 V6
Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.0 V6
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6vsJaguarXJ (X351)5.0 V8
2.0
P300
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 2019P300
3.0 V6
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6vsJaguarXJ (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXE (X760)Facelift 20202.0i
3.0 V6
4.2 V8
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6vsJaguarXJ Sovereign (X358)4.2 V8
2.0
2.0
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)2.0
3.0 V6
R 4.0 V8 32V
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6vsJaguarXJ (X308)R 4.0 V8 32V
2.0
3.0d V6
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0d V6
3.0 V6
R 4.0 24V Sport
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6vsJaguarXJ (X300)R 4.0 24V Sport
2.0
2.0i
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsJaguarXF (X260)Facelift 20202.0i
3.0 V6
4.2 V8 32V L
VS
JaguarXJ (X351)Facelift 20153.0 V6vsJaguarXJ (X350)4.2 V8 32V L
2.0
2.5
VS
JaguarXE (X760)2.0vsSubaruWRX STIFacelift 20182.5
Jaguar XJ (X351) · Facelift 2015 3.0 V6 vs Jaguar XE (X760) 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster