Jaguar X-type (X400)
Car comparison
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24VvsVolkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Jetta V
2.0 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,526 kg3,364 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range688 km427 mi
- Largest trunk527 L
- Best economy score85/100
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Best power-to-weight147 hp/t110 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score77/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 279Nm206lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,570kg3,461lb | 1,526kg3,364lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 63.1s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 65.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.2s Calculated | 26.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.8L/100 km15.9mpg US19.1mpg UK | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 147hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 592km368mi Calculated | 688km427mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,968cc181cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,672mm184in | 4,554mm179in |
| Width | 1,789mm70in | 1,781mm70in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,459mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,710mm107in | 2,578mm101in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,534mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,537mm61in | 1,512mm60in |
| Trunk volume | - | 527L |
| Max trunk volume | 452L | - |
| Doors | 4 | 4 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 61L | 55L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 5,100 rpm | 1,800-5,000 rpm | 5,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.2 s | 26.7 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 161 km/h 100 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 231 hp 172 kW |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V has 31 hp more than Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: 31 hp (23 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 7.0 s |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V and Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI and Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V: 2.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 592 km 368 mi |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 688 km 427 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 231 hp 172 kW | 7.0 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.2 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V |
| 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarX-type (X400)3.0 i V6 24V | VolkswagenJetta V2.0 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 279 Nm 206 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,570 kg 3,461 lb | 1,526 kg 3,364 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.3 L/100 km 22.8 mpg US 27.4 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 592 km 368 mi | 688 km 427 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 452 L 16.0 cu ft | 527 L 18.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 147 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V | Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.03 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.01 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,545 L408 US gal340 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,704 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar X-type (X400) 3.0 i V6 24V
- Has 31 hp more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Jetta V 2.0 TFSI
- Has 1 Nm more
- Is 44 kg lighter
- Uses 2.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 95 km (59 mi) more estimated range
- Has 75 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























