Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004
Car comparison
Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.5TvsJaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar X-Type Estate
2.5 i V6 24V Sport
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,595 kg3,516 lb
- Best power-to-weight132 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption12.9 L/100 km18.2 mpg US21.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk485 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 196hp146kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 241Nm178lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,595kg3,516lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 2,130kg4,696lb | 2,080kg4,586lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.0s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 79.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.3s Calculated | 37.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.9L/100 km18.2mpg US21.9mpg UK | 13.8L/100 km17mpg US20.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 132hp/t98kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 122hp/t91kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 201Nm/t134lb-ft/ton Calculated | 150Nm/t100lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 761km473mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,521cc154cu in | 2,495cc152cu in |
| Length | 4,710mm185in | 4,716mm186in |
| Width | 1,804mm71in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,483mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,755mm108in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,551mm61in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,548mm61in | 1,537mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 485L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,641L | 1,415L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: Power / Torque
- Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 6,800 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.3 s | 37.5 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 196 hp 146 kW |
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T has 14 hp more than Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport and Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 7.4 s |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T and Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport: 1.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | 210 hp 157 kW | 7.4 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | 196 hp 146 kW | 8.5 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.5T | JaguarX-Type Estate2.5 i V6 24V Sport | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 196 hp 146 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 241 Nm 178 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,595 kg 3,516 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.2 L/100 km 25.6 mpg US 30.7 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 761 km 473 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 485 L 17.1 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 132 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 122 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.2 L/100 km25.6 mpg US30.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.91 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,380 L365 US gal304 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,415 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.5T
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 79 Nm more
- Is 15 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 40 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Jaguar X-Type Estate 2.5 i V6 24V Sport
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























