Jaguar I-Pace · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Jaguar I-Pace · Facelift 2023 EV400 90 kWhvsOnvo L60 85 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonOnvo L60
85 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar I-Pace Facelift 2023 EV400 90 kWh
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Highest torque696 Nm513 lb-ft
- Largest trunk656 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score72/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Onvo L60 85 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Most powerful462 hp345 kW
- Lightest1,980 kg4,365 lb
- Best power-to-weight233 hp/t174 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarI-PaceFacelift 2023EV400 90 kWh | OnvoL6085 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 462hp345kW |
| Torque | 696Nm513lb-ft | 440Nm325lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,133kg4,702lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Gross weight | 2,670kg5,886lb | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 42.6s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 32.9s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.9s Calculated | 30.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 12.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 188hp/t140kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 326Nm/t218lb-ft/ton Calculated | 222Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,682mm184in | 4,828mm190in |
| Width | 2,011mm79in | 1,930mm76in |
| Height | 1,566mm62in | 1,616mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,990mm118in | 2,950mm116in |
| Front track | 1,643mm65in | 1,666mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,662mm65in | 1,677mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 174mm7in | 175mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 656L | 495L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,453L | 1,505L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarI-PaceFacelift 2023EV400 90 kWh | OnvoL6085 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.9 s | 30.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | 203 km/h 126 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.0 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 12.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 168 km/h 104 mph | 171 km/h 106 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarI-PaceFacelift 2023EV400 90 kWh | 400 hp 298 kW |
| OnvoL6085 kWh | 462 hp 345 kW |
Onvo L60 85 kWh has 62 hp more than Jaguar I-Pace Facelift 2023 EV400 90 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar I-Pace Facelift 2023 EV400 90 kWh and Onvo L60 85 kWh: 62 hp (46 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarI-PaceFacelift 2023EV400 90 kWh | 696 Nm 513 lb-ft |
| OnvoL6085 kWh | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarI-PaceFacelift 2023EV400 90 kWh | 2,133 kg 4,702 lb |
| OnvoL6085 kWh | 1,980 kg 4,365 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarI-PaceFacelift 2023EV400 90 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| OnvoL6085 kWh | 203 km/h 126 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarI-PaceFacelift 2023EV400 90 kWh | 4.8 s |
| OnvoL6085 kWh | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Onvo L60 85 kWh and Jaguar I-Pace Facelift 2023 EV400 90 kWh: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarI-PaceFacelift 2023EV400 90 kWh | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| OnvoL6085 kWh | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarI-PaceFacelift 2023EV400 90 kWh | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| OnvoL6085 kWh | 462 hp 345 kW | 4.6 s | 203 km/h 126 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarI-PaceFacelift 2023EV400 90 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| OnvoL6085 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarI-PaceFacelift 2023EV400 90 kWh | OnvoL6085 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 462 hp 345 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 696 Nm 513 lb-ft | 440 Nm 325 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | 203 km/h 126 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,133 kg 4,702 lb | 1,980 kg 4,365 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 656 L 23.2 cu ft | 495 L 17.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 188 hp/t 140 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar I-Pace Facelift 2023 EV400 90 kWh
- Has 256 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 161 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Onvo L60 85 kWh
- Has 62 hp more
- Is 153 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 46 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























